discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281 AT gmail.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 22:37:58 -0500
I do not know about .hm, but .su was the ccTLD for the Soviet Union. It was kept after the USSR collapsed because it was in use and the decision was taken not to blow away the domains under it.
vv AT cgs.pw wrote:
Indeed not all. Two common ones are .hm and .su.
~ vv
Not all two letter strings are country codes, but all ISO-3166 country
codes are (and will be) two-letter strings. Reserving two letter TLDs
as ccTLDs is *not* an ICANN policy--it is an IETF policy codified in the
RFCs before ICANN existed.
NO!
No to .js and double NO to deviating from the RFCs on ccTLDs. All
potential ccTLDs should remain reserved.
spaesani AT mail.com wrote:
Not all 2 letters are country codes. From my view ICAN 's policies
don't need to be repeated where they incur unnecessary restrictions.
I move for a review of that condition of the policy.
--
spaesani AT mail.com
Friday, 26 August 2016, 04:35AM -04:00 from Tim Groeneveld tim AT timg.ws
<mailto:tim AT timg.ws>:
Two letter TLDs are reserved for country codes.
---- On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:19:24 +1000 * 1073384916 AT qq.com
</compose?To=1073384916 AT qq.com> * wrote ----
We Want to propose the TLD .JS, and the .JS is going to be
according all OpenNic Policies .
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/26/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Tim Groeneveld, 08/26/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/27/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Paginas Web y Servidores :: Ventas, 08/27/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, vv, 08/27/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/28/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Paginas Web y Servidores :: Ventas, 08/27/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/27/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Jacob Bachmeyer, 08/27/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Verax, 08/27/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, vv, 08/27/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Jacob Bachmeyer, 08/27/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/29/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/29/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/29/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, vv, 08/29/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/29/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, vv, 08/29/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/29/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/29/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Jacob Bachmeyer, 08/27/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/27/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.