Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

Can you get a phone number from them maybe?

--

-Dan Q

On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:46:27 -0600, JC <jc AT motorsports-x.com> wrote:

> maybe try sending from a different email address or 3.  the might have
> binned your email.
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Fusl Dash <opennic AT lists.dedilink.eu>
> wrote:
> 
> > Short update:
> >
> > A couple of days ago I sent Spamhaus an email (to
> > notification AT spamhaus.org and sbl-removals AT spamhaus.org) explaining who
> > we are and what we're doing, but as expected, no reply so far. Today I got
> > another email from them:
> >
> > > REMINDER: Malware DNS server at 185.121.177.177 [SBL325026]
> >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > This is an automated message from the Spamhaus Block List (SBL) 
> > > database.
> > > Do not reply to this email directly. Please follow the 'Removal
> > Procedure' shown on the SBL Advisory page (referenced below) instead.
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Dear Sir or Madam
> > >
> > > On 2016-12-16, Spamhaus has sent you an SBL notification regarding a
> > spam problem in your network:
> > >
> > > SBL Advisory: https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL325026
> > >
> > > Unfortunately we didn't received any response from you regarding this
> > issue and as of today the spam issued described in the SBL Advisory still
> > exists, threatening thousands of innocent internet users.
> > >
> > > We hereby kindly ask you to take a look at the described problem (see
> > link to SBL Advisory page above) and take the appropriate action according
> > to your ToS/AUP as soon as possible to prevent further abuse originating
> > from your network.
> > >
> > > If you have alr
> > >  eady taken care of this problem you can send in a removal request as
> > described in the SBL Advisory page referenced above (see section 'Removal
> > Procedure'). Note that your email must tell us how the spam problem has
> > been terminated (we need to know exactly how the issue has been dealt with
> > and that this spam problem is fully terminated).
> > >
> > > SBL System Robot
> > > The Spamhaus Project
> > > http://www.spamhaus.org
> >
> >
> > On 2016-12-17 20:43, Theo B wrote:
> > > Hi -
> > >
> > > So, on thursday a big conversation took place on IRC about Spamhaus
> > deciding to block Fusl's anycast DNS server IPs because a .bit domain was
> > hosting malware. The conversation never really came to a conclusion, so I
> > wanted to throw out some ideas that we talked about.
> > >
> > > Here are some of the options we talked about in IRC:
> > >
> > > 1. Just ignore Spamhaus and move along(This could be bad because some
> > ISPs block the IPs that Spamhaus blocks)
> > > 2. Send them an email explaining what we do, and how we're not
> > responsible for any of the content on .bit.. and then hope they remove it.
> > > 3. Drop .bit completely, and tell them that the content is no longer
> > there.
> > >
> > > What do you people think about this?
> > >
> > > -Theo
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------
> > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > > You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe@lists.
> > opennicproject.org
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards
> >
> > Fusl - root AT meo.ws - http://meo.ws/
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org