Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Spamhaus blocking Fusl's T2 anycast server IPs

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Spamhaus blocking Fusl's T2 anycast server IPs


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Fusl Dash <opennic AT lists.dedilink.eu>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Spamhaus blocking Fusl's T2 anycast server IPs
  • Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 22:13:59 +0100

Short update:

A couple of days ago I sent Spamhaus an email (to notification AT spamhaus.org
and sbl-removals AT spamhaus.org) explaining who we are and what we're doing,
but as expected, no reply so far. Today I got another email from them:

> REMINDER: Malware DNS server at 185.121.177.177 [SBL325026]

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automated message from the Spamhaus Block List (SBL) database.
> Do not reply to this email directly. Please follow the 'Removal Procedure'
> shown on the SBL Advisory page (referenced below) instead.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Dear Sir or Madam
>
> On 2016-12-16, Spamhaus has sent you an SBL notification regarding a spam
> problem in your network:
>
> SBL Advisory: https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL325026
>
> Unfortunately we didn't received any response from you regarding this issue
> and as of today the spam issued described in the SBL Advisory still exists,
> threatening thousands of innocent internet users.
>
> We hereby kindly ask you to take a look at the described problem (see link
> to SBL Advisory page above) and take the appropriate action according to
> your ToS/AUP as soon as possible to prevent further abuse originating from
> your network.
>
> If you have alr
> eady taken care of this problem you can send in a removal request as
> described in the SBL Advisory page referenced above (see section 'Removal
> Procedure'). Note that your email must tell us how the spam problem has
> been terminated (we need to know exactly how the issue has been dealt with
> and that this spam problem is fully terminated).
>
> SBL System Robot
> The Spamhaus Project
> http://www.spamhaus.org


On 2016-12-17 20:43, Theo B wrote:
> Hi -
>
> So, on thursday a big conversation took place on IRC about Spamhaus
> deciding to block Fusl's anycast DNS server IPs because a .bit domain was
> hosting malware. The conversation never really came to a conclusion, so I
> wanted to throw out some ideas that we talked about.
>
> Here are some of the options we talked about in IRC:
>
> 1. Just ignore Spamhaus and move along(This could be bad because some ISPs
> block the IPs that Spamhaus blocks)
> 2. Send them an email explaining what we do, and how we're not responsible
> for any of the content on .bit.. and then hope they remove it.
> 3. Drop .bit completely, and tell them that the content is no longer there.
>
> What do you people think about this?
>
> -Theo
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>

--
Best regards

Fusl - root AT meo.ws - http://meo.ws/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page