Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Spamhaus blocking Fusl's T2 anycast server IPs

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Spamhaus blocking Fusl's T2 anycast server IPs


Chronological Thread 
  • From: spaesani AT mail.com
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
  • Subject: Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Spamhaus blocking Fusl's T2 anycast server IPs
  • Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 02:16:22 +0300

Ole in our country the ISP does not apply filters to IP address requests.

--
Sent from myMail app for Android

Friday, 23 December 2016, 02:47PM -05:00 from <vv AT cgs.pw>:

An ISP doesn't need to ask anybody. lol

In fact you can use the list yourself
if you wish.

~ Ole


On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:35:23 +0300
spaesani AT mail.com wrote:

> I got ya. Your saying the IP address itself may be
> blocked by some ISPs . Can I ask what country allows an
> ISP to filter IP addresses against the wishes of the
> customers and by what authority,,eg: government filters ?
> -- Sent from myMail app for Android Saturday, 17 December
> 2016, 05:33PM -05:00 from Theo B < me AT theos.space> :
>
> >It does more then just preventing access to .bit
> >domains. If the IP stays blacklisted, anyone who has an
> >ISP that follows Spamhaus's blocklist will not be able
> >to access Fusl's anycast DNS servers. This would suck,
> >because anycast servers are awesome, and we'd lose a
> >T2 :/
> >
> >On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 5:29 PM, < spaesani AT mail.com >
> >wrote:
> >>How exactly does that prevent someone from accessing
> >>a .bit domain? No links, just a brief explanation.
> >>--
> >>Sent from myMail app for Android Saturday, 17 December
> >>2016, 02:43PM -05:00 from Theo B < me AT theos.space >:
> >>
> >>>Hi -
> >>>
> >>>So, on thursday a big conversation took place on IRC
> >>>about Spamhaus deciding to block Fusl's anycast DNS
> >>>server IPs because a .bit domain was hosting malware.
> >>>The conversation never really came to a conclusion, so
> >>>I wanted to throw out some ideas that we talked about.
> >>>
> >>>Here are some of the options we talked about in IRC:
> >>>
> >>>1. Just ignore Spamhaus and move along(This could be
> >>>bad because some ISPs block the IPs that Spamhaus
> >>>blocks) 2. Send them an email explaining what we do,
> >>>and how we're not responsible for any of the content
> >>>on .bit.. and then hope they remove it. 3. Drop .bit
> >>>completely, and tell them that the content is no
> >>>longer there.
> >>>
> >>>What do you people think about this?
> >>>
> >>>-Theo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--------
> >>>You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >>>You may unsubscribe by emailing
> >>>discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--------
> >>You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >>You may unsubscribe by emailing
> >>discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--------
> >You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >You may unsubscribe by emailing
> >discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page