Discuss mailing list

[Hillebrand van de Groep <hillebrand AT flippylosaurus.eu>]

There is no central organization in the .bit system. If one server operator decides to act like one, users will lose trust in the server (and it's operator). If a operator blocks one domain, what will stop him from blocking another one _without_ any malicious intent?

On January 4, 2017 9:23:15 PM GMT+01:00, JC <jc AT motorsports-x.com> wrote:

i agree with the sentiment of not censoring anyone... but when malware traffic is out to cause harm.. i feel there is a duty to prevent that harm.. i would have no problem with the Access control in this case... but that's just me.   i would not be upset either way to be honest.  

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Fusl Dash <opennic AT lists.dedilink.eu> wrote:

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: FINAL REMINDER: Malware DNS server at 185.121.177.177 [SBL325026]
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 20:50:19 +0100
From: The Spamhaus Project - SBL Removals <sbl-removals AT spamhaus.org>
Organization: The Spamhaus Project
To: Kevin Holly | FuslVZ Ltd <holly AT fuslvz.ws>

Hello Kevin

Thanks for contacting Spamhaus!

Looking into the malware's botnet trafic, it appears that it is using
your DNS server to resolve .bit domain names. So the easiest way to
prevent that the malware can communicate with it's botnet controller
(C&C) would be to create an ACL for the said botnet C&C domain
(nutsystem325z.bit) to prevent that it is being resolved through your
DNS server.

Please understand that we are unable to remove this listing unless the
documented abuse problem has been fully terminated.

If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

--
Best regards
Thomas Morrison

SBL Removal Team
The Spamhaus Project
Geneva, Switzerland
http://www.spamhaus.org

On 04.01.2017 16:42, Kevin Holly | FuslVZ Ltd wrote:
> Dear madam or sir,
>
> the DNS resolver in question is a *recursive* DNS resolver and part of the OpenNIC Project (https://www.opennicproject.org/ - alternative root-zone) responsible for offering *the* uncensored, open and democratic DNS system and root-zone that people need in this world right at this moment.
>
> › dig +short NS nutsystem325z.bit. @185.121.177.177
> ns1.domaincoin.net.
> ns2.domaincoin.net.
> -> ns1.domaincoin.net. and ns2.domaincoin.net. are authoritative for nutsystem325z.bit.
>
> › dig +short A ns1.domaincoin.net. @185.121.177.177
> 83.96.168.183
> › dig +short A ns2.domaincoin.net. @185.121.177.177
> 108.61.40.140
> -> Neither ns1 nor ns2 are in any way associated with my server 185.121.177.177
>
> › dig +short A nut22.nutsystem325z.bit @83.96.168.183
> 202.78.227.61
> › dig +short A nut22.nutsystem325z.bit @108.61.40.140
> 202.78.227.61
> -> ns1.domaincoin.net. and ns2.domaincoin.net. are authoritative for this and therefore answer with the A record in question.
>
> The .bit DNS zone authoritative for the domain in question is hosted by Namecoin, a blockchain based information network similar to how Bitcoin transactions are executed, therefore there is no single point of failure or person or company who is able to manage or censor any domains.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kevin Holly | Chief Executive Officer
>
> kevin.holly AT fuslvz.ws | +43 699 1334 7295
>  _____          ___     _______
> |  ___|   _ ___| \ \   / /__  /
> | |_ | | | / __| |\ \ / /  / /
> |  _|| |_| \__ \ | \ V /  / /_
> |_|   \__,_|___/_|  \_/  /____|
>
>
> On 2017-01-04 16:08, notification AT spamhaus.org wrote:
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This is an automated message from the Spamhaus Block List (SBL) database.
>> Do not reply to this email directly. Please follow the 'Removal Procedure' shown on the SBL Advisory page (referenced below) instead.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Dear Sir or Madam
>>
>> In the past weeks, Spamhaus reached out to you several times regarding the following abuse issue in your network:
>>
>> SBL Advisory: https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL325026
>>
>> We have already sent an abuse report to you regarding this abuse problem on 2016-12-16 as well as a reminder on 2016-12-27. However, we still didn't received any response from you regarding this abuse issue and as of today the described abuse problem still exists, threatening thousands of innocent internet users.
>>
>> We hereby kindly ask you once again to take the appropriate action according to your ToS/AUP at the earliest convenience to p
>>  revent further abuse being generated on your network.
>>
>> This is our 3rd and last reminder. Since the ongoing persistence of this abuse issue and your unresponsive behaviour, Spamhaus currently considers your network as harmful and risky to Spamhaus SBL users. Should your company fail to address the described abuse problem within the next 24 hours, Spamhaus will issue an escalation listing for your network, per SBL escalation policy for 'knowingly providing spam support services'. This escalation may take effect in 24 hours time.
>>
>> Spamhaus SBL Policy & Listing Criteria:
>> http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/policy.html
>>
>> Please be aware that a listing on the SBL means that email from the IP addresses listed (or containing references to any web site hosted on the IP addresses listed) may be rejected by Internet networks that use the SBL to filter inbound mail.
>>
>> Please take action quickly.
>> Thank you.
>>
>> --
>> SBL System Robot
>> The Spamhaus Project
>> http://www.spamhaus.org
>>

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.