Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - RE: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Voting Commenced

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

RE: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Voting Commenced


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Joseph Marsden <josephmarsden AT towerdevs.xyz>
  • To: "discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
  • Subject: RE: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Voting Commenced
  • Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:27:19 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=josephmarsden AT towerdevs.xyz;
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

Hi all,
I'd like to cancel this proposal, for the reasons everyone has outlined and
the factor that it is most likely not going to succeed.
Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org
[mailto:discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org] On Behalf Of Christopher
Sent: 20 February 2017 4:21 PM
To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Voting Commenced

I agree on the concern around a separate management entity involved with the
TLD. It appears they're trying to have the main domain names (2nd level) to
promote their own services, with domain registrations being secondary. If
they were two separate things (one group for the TLD, one group that has to
register domains like anyone else that provides services) I would be okay
with it.

As is, I vote no.

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Amunak <amunak AT amunak.net> wrote:
> I see it pretty much the same and vote no.
>
> Amunak
>
>
> Dne 18.02.2017 v 23:51 kevin napsal(a):
>
> I apologize for piggy backing on this response, but I've been sitting
> here since the voting opened, trying to decide how to respond.
>
> I think there is still discussion to be having on this, although if
> discussion is closed and the applicant wants this to go for a vote,
> then I have to vote no.
>
> Having said that, Jeff's response seems most appropriate to me. For
> people / providers who are looking to commercialize, the reality is
> they most likely need to convince their prospects to, at the very
> least, use opennic. Otherwise, the opennic membership are being
> prospected, and I don't think that's the intention of opennic.
>
> If I am a service provider, then most likely I will simply create a
> private TLD, have customers / prospects DNS routed through my bind,
> and peer opennic in a one way direction.
>
> Anyhow, just putting out my own meandering thoughts.
>
> Kevin
>
> On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 15:35 -0700, Jeff Taylor wrote:
>
> I vote no. From what I've had time to read this doesn't feel like it
> should be an opennic group, but rather their own group that would peer
> with opennic.
>
> Also there doesn't seem to be any clear information in the initial
> vote message to indicate how long this vote is going for or when it
> will end.
>
>
>
> On 02/17/2017 07:00 AM, josephmarsden AT towerdevs.xyz wrote:
>
> I'd like to start the official vote for the .core TLD.
>
> The updated copy of the charter can be found here:
> https://towerce-my.sharepoint.com/personal/josephmarsden_towerdevs_xyz
> /_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?docid=05f11401594b64852a61a0e3091ef2918&
> authkey=AW4f0J-G1uREgKiVblRRWxo&expiration=2017-03-04T21:12:18.000Z
>
> Highlighted amendments:
> - CoreDomain nor TOWER is ever allowed to make any money from the
> domain services of CoreDomain (eg services will be free, forever).
> - Removed some of the reserved domains that we were going to use and
> integrated them into a universal "system" domain.
> - Made usage requirements more clear (anyone who wants to host a
> server or IT administration related site or blog is allowed to use the
> .core TLD.)
> - Increased isolation between TOWER and CoreDomain.
>
> Once the vote has passed, our website and T1 server(s) will be added
> to OpenNIC.
>
> Please reply if you have any further questions, otherwise voting will
> start now.
>
> CitadelCore :)
> (P.S: I'm voting "Yes" for myself.)
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page