Discuss mailing list

[<vv AT cgs.pw>]

I don't think that voting for your own interests
is a conflict of interest. After all, people
normally vote for themselves in an election.
That's what you're supposed to do.

~ Ole


On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:46:15 -0600
kevin <krattai AT gmail.com> wrote:

> As a participating freenic member, on top of my opennic
> membership, would I be in conflict if I vote during the
> freenic peering voting?
> 
> Kevin
> 
> On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 19:36 +0000, Angélica Luna wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > I'm one of the founding members of FreeNIC
> > http://freenic.org/ a totally free and open root that
> > resolves all OpenNIC TLDs and most ICANN ones in
> > addition to TLDs chosen without rules or regulations by
> > anyone who wishes to join. Our TLDs are mainly for
> > personal use; we don't require second-level
> > registration to be available. All members have equal
> > status as we have no leadership. I'm proposing a
> > partial peering agreement, as explained below.
> > 
> > Because we have no rules, there's nothing stopping
> > conflicting TLDs from being registered. We currently
> > have .radio and .smart, which have been registered in
> > the ICANN root. The ICANN .radio and .smart have been
> > deleted from our root zone. Shdwdrgn is in the process
> > of designing a filter that would prevent OpenNIC from
> > resolving FreeNIC TLDs that conflict with OpenNIC or
> > ICANN should this peering agreement be accepted.
> > Peering wouldn't take place until the filter has been
> > implemented.
> > 
> > Please discuss and vote.
> > 
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org  
>