Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Philip Ostendorf <philip AT ostendorf.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC
  • Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 06:44:17 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Dan, OpenNIC does "not support self-named or private Top-Level
Domains". (http://wiki.opennicproject.org/AlternateNICs)

I vote no on your proposal, Angélica. The filter is a good idea, but
people could get confused as they might think that our roots are fully
compatible with each other. However, behavior is not well-defined and
we might slide into chaos. Also, I think second-level registration
should be required.


On 08.03.2017 01:02, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> [...] I would however support peering if it was handled like
> .radio.freenic or .smart.freenic.


On 06.03.2017 20:36, Angélica Luna wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm one of the founding members of FreeNIC http://freenic.org/ a
> totally free and open root that resolves all OpenNIC TLDs and most
> ICANN ones in addition to TLDs chosen without rules or regulations
> by anyone who wishes to join. Our TLDs are mainly for personal use;
> we don't require second-level registration to be available. All
> members have equal status as we have no leadership. I'm proposing a
> partial peering agreement, as explained below.
>
> Because we have no rules, there's nothing stopping conflicting TLDs
> from being registered. We currently have .radio and .smart, which
> have been registered in the ICANN root. The ICANN .radio and .smart
> have been deleted from our root zone. Shdwdrgn is in the process of
> designing a filter that would prevent OpenNIC from resolving
> FreeNIC TLDs that conflict with OpenNIC or ICANN should this
> peering agreement be accepted. Peering wouldn't take place until
> the filter has been implemented.
>
> Please discuss and vote.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=JFNW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page