discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: киллман из ада <killman AT dkcorp.ec>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 22:16:05 -0500
You said it very well, my friend.
--
Dkcorp.ec Inc.
Connecting the world
Network operations center
+593 995 956811 | +593 7 2952-763
"""This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager."""
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:35 PM, <vv AT cgs.pw> wrote:
I don't think that voting for your own interests
is a conflict of interest. After all, people
normally vote for themselves in an election.
That's what you're supposed to do.
~ Ole
On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:46:15 -0600
kevin <krattai AT gmail.com> wrote:
> As a participating freenic member, on top of my opennic
> membership, would I be in conflict if I vote during the
> freenic peering voting?
>
> Kevin
>
> On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 19:36 +0000, Angélica Luna wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm one of the founding members of FreeNIC
> > http://freenic.org/ a totally free and open root that
> > resolves all OpenNIC TLDs and most ICANN ones in
> > addition to TLDs chosen without rules or regulations by
> > anyone who wishes to join. Our TLDs are mainly for
> > personal use; we don't require second-level
> > registration to be available. All members have equal
> > status as we have no leadership. I'm proposing a
> > partial peering agreement, as explained below.
> >
> > Because we have no rules, there's nothing stopping
> > conflicting TLDs from being registered. We currently
> > have .radio and .smart, which have been registered in
> > the ICANN root. The ICANN .radio and .smart have been
> > deleted from our root zone. Shdwdrgn is in the process
> > of designing a filter that would prevent OpenNIC from
> > resolving FreeNIC TLDs that conflict with OpenNIC or
> > ICANN should this peering agreement be accepted.
> > Peering wouldn't take place until the filter has been
> > implemented.
> >
> > Please discuss and vote.
> >
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Angélica Luna, 03/06/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, kevin, 03/06/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, vv, 03/06/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, киллман из ада, 03/07/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, vv, 03/06/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Daniel Quintiliani, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Philip Ostendorf, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, vv, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Philip Ostendorf, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, vv, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Philip Ostendorf, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Fusl Dash, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Theo B, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Joseph Marsden, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Angélica Luna, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Fusl Dash, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Philip Ostendorf, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Fusl Dash, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Angélica Luna, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, kevin, 03/06/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.