discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Philip Ostendorf <philip AT ostendorf.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:50:29 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Imagine this: An OpenNIC user is on a FreeNIC website A that links to
another FreeNIC website B. A's TLD is in the OpenNIC root but B's TLD
is not. A dead link is the best scenario in this case, it could also
be a totally unrelated website. I would be confused by this scenario.
I should not register something with myself, but I should let people
register SLDs on my TLD. Having a whole TLD for myself seems quite
greedy and not compatible with OpenNIC's ideas.
On 08.03.2017 08:26, vv AT cgs.pw wrote:
>
> I'm not sure who would get confused. In any case second level
> registration would serve no practical purpose for us. Why would I
> "register" something with myself?
>
> ~ Ole
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=jKsG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Angélica Luna, 03/06/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, kevin, 03/06/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, vv, 03/06/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, киллман из ада, 03/07/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, vv, 03/06/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Daniel Quintiliani, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Philip Ostendorf, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, vv, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Philip Ostendorf, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, vv, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Philip Ostendorf, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Fusl Dash, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Theo B, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Joseph Marsden, 03/08/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Angélica Luna, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Fusl Dash, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Philip Ostendorf, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Angélica Luna, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Philip Ostendorf, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Jonah Aragon, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Philip Ostendorf, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Angélica Luna, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Philip Ostendorf, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Fusl Dash, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, Angélica Luna, 03/10/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] peering with FreeNIC, kevin, 03/06/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.