Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Allow libre material on/libre use of .libre

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Allow libre material on/libre use of .libre


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Allow libre material on/libre use of .libre
  • Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 21:13:05 -0600
  • Authentication-results: mx1.computerrehab.us; dmarc=none header.from=sourpuss.net
  • Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.0 mx1.computerrehab.us E6BF82D522

We don't have to 'force' anybody to do anything.  If .bit wants to continue hosting domains with no purpose other than distributing malware, that is their right.  But opennic also has the right to not be complicit in that distribution.

You seem to indicate you are against all forms of censorship.  So if someone's computer gets infected and they don't have the money or the knowledge to fix it, you are perfectly fine with their voice being silenced from the internet?  And you would feel justified in your stance even though you know that you could have prevented this from happening?


On 11/03/2017 01:20 PM, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
+1. What's next, mandatory logging of all servers for the NSA?

Also, I will repeat my last message:

We can't force domains we peer with internationally to not host malware or comply with our definition of "legal" - this is the hosting provider's job.

--

-Dan Q


On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 01:24:25 +0100, Amunak <amunak AT amunak.net> wrote:

I don't think we should make too many limiting rules. For one, if (when)
OpenNIC grows it'll be impossible to realistically check domains for
legality or even malware and such. And when we do it only when requested
to take down the content, is it really fair? And who gets to decide if
the rules are truly broken? I don't think T2 (or even T1) server owners
should be pressured to do any blocking. If they want to do so, and
disclose it then sure. Especially if it's to follow the laws of their
respective countries or to protect OpenNIC infrastructure. But force
them to do so? Not really. (Just a sidenote: I thought one goals of
OpenNIC was openness, privacy and no censorship - if we don't uphold
these values are we better than ICANN and why do we really exist?)



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page