Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

"valid or invalid" should "whether passed or failed"

--

-Dan Q


On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:09:55 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani" 
<danq AT runbox.com> wrote:

> OpenNIC proposals should not be used to target specific members and give 
> opinions about their character or actions. Jonah's upcoming proposal to 
> invalidate the ongoing vote (which I have no control over, and would stop 
> if I could) makes references to "Daniel Q." along with the phrase "sane 
> recount" and accusations of myself engaging in "misleading" behavior.
> 
> These defamatory "troll votes" have no place in OpenNIC and if that first 
> paragraph is included as is, the whole purpose of the vote becomes a 
> personal attack on me and accusation of me engaging in fraudulent, 
> potentially illegal activity.
> 
> This is my proposal, yea/nay, which will be put up to vote on 8/7/2018:
> 
> OpenNIC proposals shall not contain, in full or in part, language which:
> 
> * Praises an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
> * Condemns an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
> * Makes allegations of unethical or illegal activity by an OpenNIC member, 
> unless confirmed by a court of law, and/or
> * Criticizes or comments on a proposal or vote, past or present, valid or 
> invalid, in which an OpenNIC member is criticized on basis of their 
> character or actions.
> 
> The proposal shall take effect immediately after passing.
> 
> --
> 
> -Dan Q
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org