Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

I understand your concern with "praising" and wish to use it with good 
intentions, however "praising" including in the example you provide does not 
belong in a proposal regardless.

While helpful in discussion, comments and opinions do not belong in proposals.

--

-Dan Q

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 18:42:13 +0200, Megan Parat <megan.parat AT yahoo.com> wrote:

> I'd much rather have a code of conduct than this proposal.
> 
> I find the current proposal very vague, for example "Praises an OpenNIC 
> member on basis of their character or actions" could apply to thanking 
> someone for helping setup a server.
> Also, "Criticizes or comments on a proposal or vote, past or present, 
> [whether passed or failed] in which an OpenNIC member is criticized on 
> basis of their character or actions." is very specific and corresponds 
> to recent events. It could also apply to any form of comment on a proposal.
> 
> Megan
> 
> 
> On 07/31/2018 06:20 PM, Rouben wrote:
> > Sounds good to me... not privy to the history you allude to firsthand, 
> > but the proposal itself sounds good.
> >
> > I’d recommend establishing a code of ethics/ conduct for OpenNIC, 
> > rather than this proposal. I’m sure there are plenty of those on the 
> > Net we could adopt/adapt.
> >
> > Rouben
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 12:15 Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com 
> > <mailto:danq AT runbox.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     "valid or invalid" should "whether passed or failed"
> >
> >     --
> >
> >     -Dan Q
> >
> >
> >     On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:09:55 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani"
> >     <danq AT runbox.com <mailto:danq AT runbox.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     > OpenNIC proposals should not be used to target specific members
> >     and give opinions about their character or actions. Jonah's
> >     upcoming proposal to invalidate the ongoing vote (which I have no
> >     control over, and would stop if I could) makes references to
> >     "Daniel Q." along with the phrase "sane recount" and accusations
> >     of myself engaging in "misleading" behavior.
> >     >
> >     > These defamatory "troll votes" have no place in OpenNIC and if
> >     that first paragraph is included as is, the whole purpose of the
> >     vote becomes a personal attack on me and accusation of me engaging
> >     in fraudulent, potentially illegal activity.
> >     >
> >     > This is my proposal, yea/nay, which will be put up to vote on
> >     8/7/2018:
> >     >
> >     > OpenNIC proposals shall not contain, in full or in part,
> >     language which:
> >     >
> >     > * Praises an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
> >     > * Condemns an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
> >     > * Makes allegations of unethical or illegal activity by an
> >     OpenNIC member, unless confirmed by a court of law, and/or
> >     > * Criticizes or comments on a proposal or vote, past or present,
> >     valid or invalid, in which an OpenNIC member is criticized on
> >     basis of their character or actions.
> >     >
> >     > The proposal shall take effect immediately after passing.
> >     >
> >     > --
> >     >
> >     > -Dan Q
> >
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org