Discuss mailing list

[Philipp Schafft <lion AT lion.leolix.org>]

Good evening,

On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 12:09 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> OpenNIC proposals should not be used to target specific members and
> give opinions about their character or actions. Jonah's upcoming
> proposal to invalidate the ongoing vote (which I have no control over,
> and would stop if I could) makes references to "Daniel Q." along with
> the phrase "sane recount" and accusations of myself engaging in
> "misleading" behavior.
> 
> These defamatory "troll votes" have no place in OpenNIC and if that
> first paragraph is included as is, the whole purpose of the vote
> becomes a personal attack on me and accusation of me engaging in
> fraudulent, potentially illegal activity.

So you decided to do exactly what he did as counter attack?
Writing a "PROPOSAL" that is a direct reaction to his "PROPOSAL"
attacking him, trying to render his "PROPOSAL" invalid and/or void?

Good job.

> This is my proposal, yea/nay, which will be put up to vote on
> 8/7/2018:
> 
> OpenNIC proposals shall not contain, in full or in part, language
> which:
> 
> * Praises an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
> * Condemns an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
> * Makes allegations of unethical or illegal activity by an OpenNIC
> member, unless confirmed by a court of law, and/or

Ah, there is the "unethical" and "illegal" again I have talked about so
many times.... Why do people still love them so much?


> * Criticizes or comments on a proposal or vote, past or present, valid
> or invalid, in which an OpenNIC member is criticized on basis of their
> character or actions.
> 
> The proposal shall take effect immediately after passing.

"or actions". So, for example if someone writes an "PROPOSAL" for a new
TLD it may no longer be considered if that person can actually run the
TLD (ref: the working registration system requirement that was discussed
very lengthy).


With best regards,

-- 
Philipp.
 (Rah of PH2)