Discuss mailing list

[Megan Parat <megan.parat AT yahoo.com>]

I'd much rather have a code of conduct than this proposal.

I find the current proposal very vague, for example "Praises an OpenNIC 
member on basis of their character or actions" could apply to thanking 
someone for helping setup a server.
Also, "Criticizes or comments on a proposal or vote, past or present, 
[whether passed or failed] in which an OpenNIC member is criticized on 
basis of their character or actions." is very specific and corresponds 
to recent events. It could also apply to any form of comment on a proposal.

Megan


On 07/31/2018 06:20 PM, Rouben wrote:
> Sounds good to me... not privy to the history you allude to firsthand, 
> but the proposal itself sounds good.
>
> I’d recommend establishing a code of ethics/ conduct for OpenNIC, 
> rather than this proposal. I’m sure there are plenty of those on the 
> Net we could adopt/adapt.
>
> Rouben
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 12:15 Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com 
> <mailto:danq AT runbox.com>> wrote:
>
>     "valid or invalid" should "whether passed or failed"
>
>     --
>
>     -Dan Q
>
>
>     On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:09:55 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani"
>     <danq AT runbox.com <mailto:danq AT runbox.com>> wrote:
>
>     > OpenNIC proposals should not be used to target specific members
>     and give opinions about their character or actions. Jonah's
>     upcoming proposal to invalidate the ongoing vote (which I have no
>     control over, and would stop if I could) makes references to
>     "Daniel Q." along with the phrase "sane recount" and accusations
>     of myself engaging in "misleading" behavior.
>     >
>     > These defamatory "troll votes" have no place in OpenNIC and if
>     that first paragraph is included as is, the whole purpose of the
>     vote becomes a personal attack on me and accusation of me engaging
>     in fraudulent, potentially illegal activity.
>     >
>     > This is my proposal, yea/nay, which will be put up to vote on
>     8/7/2018:
>     >
>     > OpenNIC proposals shall not contain, in full or in part,
>     language which:
>     >
>     > * Praises an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
>     > * Condemns an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
>     > * Makes allegations of unethical or illegal activity by an
>     OpenNIC member, unless confirmed by a court of law, and/or
>     > * Criticizes or comments on a proposal or vote, past or present,
>     valid or invalid, in which an OpenNIC member is criticized on
>     basis of their character or actions.
>     >
>     > The proposal shall take effect immediately after passing.
>     >
>     > --
>     >
>     > -Dan Q