Discuss mailing list

[Amunak <amunak AT amunak.net>]

While I don't necessarily disagree with the idea that our proposals and such should be free of criticisms of members and allegations, I don't think we need to add more (mostly meaningless) buerocracy and rules to the process. I also see this as a reactionary and maybe even "in protest" proposal, and find that childish and stupid.

Therefore I vote "no", against this proposal.

On 2018-08-09 02:28, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:

Voting starts: 8/9/2018 0030 UTC
Voting ends: 8/16/2018 0030 UTC

OpenNIC proposals shall not contain, in full or in part, language which:

* Praises an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
* Condemns an OpenNIC member on basis of their character or actions,
* Makes allegations of unethical or illegal activity by an OpenNIC member, unless confirmed by a court of law, and/or
* Criticizes or comments on a proposal or vote, past or present, whether passed or failed, in which an OpenNIC member is criticized on basis of their character or actions.

The proposal shall take effect immediately after passing.

These rules are only applicable to proposals put up for vote, not to mailing list or IRC discussion.

--

-Dan Q

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org