Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS][MISSCOUNT] Invalidate previous votes

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS][MISSCOUNT] Invalidate previous votes


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>
  • To: "discuss" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS][MISSCOUNT] Invalidate previous votes
  • Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 04:25:57 -0400 (EDT)

You don't have the right to two spoiled votes any more than anyone has the
right to two legitimate votes.

--

-Dan Q

On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:21:37 +0100, Sebastian Makowiecki <soocki AT mailbox.org>
wrote:

> The overall number of spoiled votes equals to three which is correct. I got
> carried away and casted two separate invalid votes, which also were noted.
> All seems in order.
>
> ~
> Sebastian Makowiecki
>
> On 15 August 2018 01:17:41 GMT+01:00, Jonah Aragon <jonah AT opennic.org>
> wrote:
> >This is a democracy, the original proposer can vote as they please.
> >Like I mentioned in Discord, the proposer not voting would be like the
> >president not voting on Election Day. Ridiculous.
> >
> >Also it looks like your count has the same outcome, I’m not sure what
> >the deal is. Additionally, you have two “spoiled” votes by the same
> >person in your count, that’s especially incorrect.
> >
> >Jonah
> >
> >> On Aug 14, 2018, at 4:44 AM, Philipp Schafft <lion AT lion.leolix.org>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Good morning,
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 22:12 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> >>> Results:
> >>>
> >>> Yes:
> >>>
> >>> Daniel Quintiliani
> >>> Katie Holly
> >>> Alex Hanselka
> >>> vv
> >>> Grant Baron
> >>> Jack Ternan
> >>> sy
> >>> gp
> >>> Megan Parat
> >>> Jacob Bachmeyer
> >>>
> >>> No:
> >>>
> >>> Christopher
> >>>
> >>> Passed 10-1.
> >>> Effective as of August 16, 2018.
> >>
> >> I count differently. I must insist on someone else doing a third
> >> counting.
> >>
> >> (Also I VERY STRONGLY consider the counting by the proposer a bad
> >thing
> >> and IN NO EVENT trustworthy. Counting of voices MUST be done by
> >someone
> >> independent.)
> >>
> >> I count:
> >> No:
> >> * Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Spoiled:
> >> * Amunak <amunak AT amunak.net>
> >> * Sebastian Makowiecki <soocki AT mailbox.org> in
> >> <13EA7381-2E46-44B7-9D16-498DD43178A3 AT mailbox.org>
> >> * Sebastian Makowiecki <soocki AT mailbox.org> in
> >> <AFE2029E-839A-4E5C-8F82-4B32D2A20DE3 AT mailbox.org>
> >> * Philipp Schafft <lion AT lion.leolix.org>
> >>
> >> Yes:
> >> * Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281 AT gmail.com>
> >> * Megan Parat <megan.parat AT yahoo.com>
> >> * gp AT gparent.net
> >> * sy <sy AT zm.is>
> >> * Jack Ternan <jackist AT email.com>
> >> * vv AT cgs.pw
> >> * Grant Baron <grant AT hqm.me>
> >> * Alex Hanselka <amh AT ddna.co>
> >> * Katie Holly <katie AT opennic.org>
> >> * Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> Proposer!
> >>
> >> No: 1, Spoiled: 3, Yes: 10
> >> Total votes: 14.
> >>
> >> No: 1/14 = ~7.14%, Spoiled: 3/14 = ~21.43%, Yes: 10/14 = ~71.43%
> >>
> >> 'Yes' would pass.
> >>
> >>
> >> I must also note here that I personally feel that who proposes should
> >> not vote at all or vote invalid. It's a matter of kindness and honor.
> >> And also often enforced by voting rules.
> >>
> >> With best regards,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Philipp.
> >> (Rah of PH2)
> >>
> >>
> >> --------
> >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> >discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page