Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS][MISSCOUNT] Invalidate previous votes

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS][MISSCOUNT] Invalidate previous votes


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Sebastian Makowiecki <soocki AT mailbox.org>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS][MISSCOUNT] Invalidate previous votes
  • Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:28:19 +0100

Therefore it was counted once? Where is the issue now Mr Issues?

~
Sebastian Makowiecki

On 15 August 2018 09:25:57 GMT+01:00, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
You don't have the right to two spoiled votes any more than anyone has the right to two legitimate votes.

--

-Dan Q

On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:21:37 +0100, Sebastian Makowiecki <soocki AT mailbox.org> wrote:

The overall number of spoiled votes equals to three which is correct. I got carried away and casted two separate invalid votes, which also were noted. All seems in order.

~
Sebastian Makowiecki

On 15 August 2018 01:17:41 GMT+01:00, Jonah Aragon <jonah AT opennic.org> wrote:
This is a democracy, the original proposer can vote as they please.
Like I mentioned in Discord, the proposer not voting would be like the
president not voting on Election Day. Ridiculous.

Also it looks like your count has the same outcome, I’m not sure what
the deal is. Additionally, you have two “spoiled” votes by the same
person in your count, that’s especially incorrect.

Jonah

On Aug 14, 2018, at 4:44 AM, Philipp Schafft <lion AT lion.leolix.org>
wrote:

Good morning,

On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 22:12 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
Results:

Yes:

Daniel Quintiliani
Katie Holly
Alex Hanselka
vv
Grant Baron
Jack Ternan
sy
gp
Megan Parat
Jacob Bachmeyer

No:

Christopher

Passed 10-1.
Effective as of August 16, 2018.

I count differently. I must insist on someone else doing a third
counting.

(Also I VERY STRONGLY consider the counting by the proposer a bad
thing
and IN NO EVENT trustworthy. Counting of voices MUST be done by
someone
independent.)

I count:
No:
* Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>

Spoiled:
* Amunak <amunak AT amunak.net>
* Sebastian Makowiecki <soocki AT mailbox.org> in
<13EA7381-2E46-44B7-9D16-498DD43178A3 AT mailbox.org>
* Sebastian Makowiecki <soocki AT mailbox.org> in
<AFE2029E-839A-4E5C-8F82-4B32D2A20DE3 AT mailbox.org>
* Philipp Schafft <lion AT lion.leolix.org>

Yes:
* Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281 AT gmail.com>
* Megan Parat <megan.parat AT yahoo.com>
* gp AT gparent.net
* sy <sy AT zm.is>
* Jack Ternan <jackist AT email.com>
* vv AT cgs.pw
* Grant Baron <grant AT hqm.me>
* Alex Hanselka <amh AT ddna.co>
* Katie Holly <katie AT opennic.org>
* Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> Proposer!

No: 1, Spoiled: 3, Yes: 10
Total votes: 14.

No: 1/14 = ~7.14%, Spoiled: 3/14 = ~21.43%, Yes: 10/14 = ~71.43%

'Yes' would pass.


I must also note here that I personally feel that who proposes should
not vote at all or vote invalid. It's a matter of kindness and honor.
And also often enforced by voting rules.

With best regards,

--
Philipp.
(Rah of PH2)


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing
discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org


--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page