Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

Apologies, I misunderstood you and the results.

Either way, the spoiled votes are here. I don't know why you think it's a 
problem when the spoiled votes are literally in this message.

--

-Dan Q


On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:28:19 +0100, Sebastian Makowiecki <soocki AT mailbox.org> 
wrote:

> Therefore it was counted once? Where is the issue now Mr Issues?
> 
> ~ 
> Sebastian Makowiecki
> 
> On 15 August 2018 09:25:57 GMT+01:00, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> 
> wrote:
> >You don't have the right to two spoiled votes any more than anyone has
> >the right to two legitimate votes.
> >
> >--
> >
> >-Dan Q
> >
> >On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 09:21:37 +0100, Sebastian Makowiecki
> ><soocki AT mailbox.org> wrote:
> >
> >> The overall number of spoiled votes equals to three which is correct.
> >I got carried away and casted two separate invalid votes, which also
> >were noted. All seems in order.
> >> 
> >> ~ 
> >> Sebastian Makowiecki
> >> 
> >> On 15 August 2018 01:17:41 GMT+01:00, Jonah Aragon
> ><jonah AT opennic.org> wrote:
> >> >This is a democracy, the original proposer can vote as they please.
> >> >Like I mentioned in Discord, the proposer not voting would be like
> >the
> >> >president not voting on Election Day. Ridiculous. 
> >> >
> >> >Also it looks like your count has the same outcome, I’m not sure
> >what
> >> >the deal is. Additionally, you have two “spoiled” votes by the same
> >> >person in your count, that’s especially incorrect. 
> >> >
> >> >Jonah
> >> >
> >> >> On Aug 14, 2018, at 4:44 AM, Philipp Schafft
> ><lion AT lion.leolix.org>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> Good morning,
> >> >> 
> >> >>> On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 22:12 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> >> >>> Results:
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> Yes:
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> Daniel Quintiliani
> >> >>> Katie Holly
> >> >>> Alex Hanselka
> >> >>> vv
> >> >>> Grant Baron
> >> >>> Jack Ternan
> >> >>> sy
> >> >>> gp
> >> >>> Megan Parat
> >> >>> Jacob Bachmeyer
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> No:
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> Christopher
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> Passed 10-1.
> >> >>> Effective as of August 16, 2018.
> >> >> 
> >> >> I count differently. I must insist on someone else doing a third
> >> >> counting.
> >> >> 
> >> >> (Also I VERY STRONGLY consider the counting by the proposer a bad
> >> >thing
> >> >> and IN NO EVENT trustworthy. Counting of voices MUST be done by
> >> >someone
> >> >> independent.)
> >> >> 
> >> >> I count:
> >> >>        No:
> >> >>              * Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>
> >> >> 
> >> >>        Spoiled:
> >> >>              * Amunak <amunak AT amunak.net>
> >> >>              * Sebastian Makowiecki <soocki AT mailbox.org> in
> >> >>                <13EA7381-2E46-44B7-9D16-498DD43178A3 AT mailbox.org>
> >> >>              * Sebastian Makowiecki <soocki AT mailbox.org> in
> >> >>                <AFE2029E-839A-4E5C-8F82-4B32D2A20DE3 AT mailbox.org>
> >> >>              * Philipp Schafft <lion AT lion.leolix.org>
> >> >> 
> >> >>        Yes:
> >> >>              * Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281 AT gmail.com>
> >> >>              * Megan Parat <megan.parat AT yahoo.com>
> >> >>              * gp AT gparent.net
> >> >>              * sy <sy AT zm.is>
> >> >>              * Jack Ternan <jackist AT email.com>
> >> >>              * vv AT cgs.pw
> >> >>              * Grant Baron <grant AT hqm.me>
> >> >>              * Alex Hanselka <amh AT ddna.co>
> >> >>              * Katie Holly <katie AT opennic.org>
> >> >>              * Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> Proposer!
> >> >> 
> >> >> No: 1, Spoiled: 3, Yes: 10
> >> >> Total votes: 14.
> >> >> 
> >> >> No: 1/14 = ~7.14%, Spoiled: 3/14 = ~21.43%, Yes: 10/14 = ~71.43%
> >> >> 
> >> >> 'Yes' would pass.
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> I must also note here that I personally feel that who proposes
> >should
> >> >> not vote at all or vote invalid. It's a matter of kindness and
> >honor.
> >> >> And also often enforced by voting rules.
> >> >> 
> >> >> With best regards,
> >> >> 
> >> >> -- 
> >> >> Philipp.
> >> >> (Rah of PH2)
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> --------
> >> >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> >> >> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> >> >discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --------
> >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> >> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> >discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org