Discuss mailing list

[<vv AT cgs.pw>]

I've posted this link before. It is somewhat
informative on the topic, but most important
is that the title uses "spoilt". The word can
also be looked up in various on-line dictionaries.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFAIzp9MCkg 

Personally, I think it is important to note
that the article's title is "Spoilt vote",
Wikipedia has a lot of eyes on it, and any
spelling mistakes (particularly in titles)
will be prompted corrected by one of the
many editors.

Please look at that article this time. There
are a number of alternatives to the word there
which you could use if you feel it is
important to avoid this particularly common one.

Regards,
        Ole



On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 19:12:33 -0400 (EDT)
"Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 23:08:50 +0000, Philipp Schafft
> <lion AT lion.leolix.org> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 18:55 -0400, Daniel Quintiliani
> > wrote:  
> > > Go for it! I will too. It was always formal here for
> > > the person with the proposal to count the votes, but
> > > as we've pointed out recently, anyone can.  
> > 
> > Why not be the first one to implement this basic rule
> > of democratic voting?
> > 
> >   
> 
> There's nobody stopping anyone from counting votes on
> this list but you. And nobody's ever had a problem with
> it before.
> 
> > > Also, I must ask, why do people keep misspelling
> > > "spoiled" here? Is it an inside joke that I missed?  
> > 
> > You again attack people. And you don't even name them.
> > On something that is perfectly not relevant to this
> > thread or important at all. Words seem to be very
> > important to you... 
> 
> How is that an attack? I truly want to know why everyone
> keeps spelling it wrong.
> 
> --
> 
> -Dan Q