Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [FurNIC] New news article

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [FurNIC] New news article


Chronological Thread 
  • From: <vv AT cgs.pw>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [FurNIC] New news article
  • Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 19:21:51 -0700

That is a pretty big stretch, and going pretty far
in reading something into what is plain English.

"Current" and "situation" are normal and simple
words. If there is some specific context then
that could be a reference, but by itself those
words don't have any special meaning.

See here:
http://www.answers.com/Q/What_does_current_situation_mean

We're getting into ESL territory here. :)

Regards,
Ole

On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:49:41 -0400 (EDT)
"Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:

> You've never heard of a business or charity use "current
> situation" when dealing with problems on the board or a
> money issue?
>
> I don't believe there's any conspiracy going on right
> now, just juvenile trolling and people whining.
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q
>
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 18:15:25 -0600, Jeff Taylor
> <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:
>
> > As a U.S. citizen, I can only say that the only time I
> > have heard "current situation" used to imply an
> > instability would be in the conspiracy threads on
> > reddit, which is obviously a regional implication.
> > Since we are dealing with a world-wide audience pretty
> > much everyone here limits their speech to the most
> > common meanings of such words without attempting to
> > imply any sub-text. You are jumping to the conclusion
> > of a non-standard definition of the words, so it makes
> > me wonder if you are attempting to imply that there is
> > in fact a conspiracy here. If so, why would you think
> > that from a general news blurb? If not, then why are
> > you trying to lead others to think there is a
> > conspiracy?
> >
> > On 08/20/2018 06:04 PM, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> > > "Current situation" usually implies instability of
> > > some sort, as if a business is about to shut down due
> > > to lack of funds.
> > >
> > > Probably half of the "trolling" going on right now is
> > > because of the differences between users' *native*
> > > languages, rather than the languages used on the
> > > mailing list. As another user pointed out, a
> > > for-German-eyes-only post about me used phrases which
> > > Google translated as nonsense with words like "round"
> > > "quick shot" and with "Mr. Quintiliani" and
> > > "demolition" in the same sentence. A German speaker,
> > > I forget who, pointed out that these are literal
> > > translations of German expressions which do not imply
> > > death threats.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > -Dan Q
> > >
> > > On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:54:02 -0600, Jeff Taylor
> > > <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:
> > >> "OpenNIC's current situation" means this is the way
> > >> things are at the moment. The news article
> > >> basically states that FurNIC is being redefined as a
> > >> 'peer' to opennic since this is technically what
> > >> they have really been for a number of years. It
> > >> doesn't change the relationship between opennic and
> > >> furnic, it simply changes the wording to more
> > >> clearly identify it as what it really is.
> > >>
> > >> However all of this should have been understood from
> > >> the news article, despite it being obvious that
> > >> English is not their first language. Did you read
> > >> the article before commenting? Do you need help
> > >> reading the English language? You seem to have a
> > >> lot to say in English on the mailing list so I don't
> > >> understand why you are having an issue understanding
> > >> what is being written here, however if you need
> > >> someone to help you interpret the text being
> > >> discussed then perhaps we can help you? Otherwise,
> > >> what exactly are you trying to ask since the answer
> > >> you were given apparently did not answer the
> > >> question you thought you were asking?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 08/20/2018 03:34 PM, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> > >>> So what's "OpenNIC's current situation" then?
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> -Dan Q
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 20:25:10 +0000, Philipp Schafft
> > >>> <lion AT lion.leolix.org> wrote:
> > >>>> Good afternoon,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 16:05 -0400, Daniel
> > >>>> Quintiliani wrote:
> > >>>>> May I ask what "OpenNIC's current situation" is?
> > >>>>> Is it "democracy" or do you just not like certain
> > >>>>> people on the list including myself?
> > >>>> The managers of the FurNIC released a news article
> > >>>> that's only intention is to clarify the relation
> > >>>> between OpenNIC and FurNIC as there has been
> > >>>> confusion in the past. That's what it is. Nothing
> > >>>> else.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> With best regards,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --------
> > >>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > >>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > >>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > >>
> > >> --------
> > >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > >> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > >> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------
> > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >
> >
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page