Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Non Profit

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Non Profit


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Alex Nordlund <deep.alexander AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Non Profit
  • Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:28:21 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=faljfdNY528+pYfmMfnHixNhCvPGqdF2RHi0a3ZDmprA67FhsPAwAxFisEbmwz2vCC YNLAIjJDf+ZwDE1wKv7KYJtVT2+8REJCK1KuBHF2k1YsCWg4jMjESbOd1PeFaix1MvWK IeUNh7dEVykHVPhXk2xmEk8lMKvuJ3fi0Y6wI=
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Bogart DeJoint <bogart AT mindvox.org> wrote:
> when did opennic take on the role of providing dns to sites of questionable
> legal status? in my view, hosting these things on specific servers which
> easily identify the individuals involved is generally a bad idea.

Freedom but not to everyone?

Remember that OpenNIC consists of two words. Open and NIC.

---
//Alex




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page