Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: PROPOSAL .nice TLD

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: PROPOSAL .nice TLD


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Hanselka, Alex" <alex AT hanselka.name>
  • To: ventas AT dedicados.com.mx
  • Cc: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: PROPOSAL .nice TLD
  • Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:59:43 -0500
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

hmmm... .sex ;)

I of course have always been a fan of .irc. Though I also don't see a huge
market for that. :)

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:49 PM, <ventas AT dedicados.com.mx> wrote:

> Ok here is again, anyone can use this tld for anything, nobody cares.
>
> you are responsible of the domain content, not TLD, not opennic, not
> tier1-2, even if we offer free hosting.
>
> if you want put a link if not dont do it.
>
> what i want? i want to make opennic more available to users, offering other
> kind of TLD, with fresh ideas and many options. Other alternative tld, have
> more than 30-50 tld, that can make users get interested on it, because they
> can pick custom or funny or alternative tlds. i have some ideas about many
> .tld that can work, of course all free to use for anything, to anybody, no
> limit, just accepting donations to mantain the servers.
>
> here is my list:
> .nice
> .box
> .irc
> .blog
> .music
> .video
> .win
> .unix
> .mac
> .xbox
> .games
> .torrent
> .life
> .beer
> .psp
> .open
> .chat
> .fun
> .old
> .dot
> .fail
> .euro
> .dot
> .sex
>
> wich one do you like it?
>
> thanks Maximi for ideas on the .tld`s
>
>
> now, what do you think about my charter?
>
>
> alex
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:33:00 -0500, Hanselka, Alex wrote:
>
>> I just don't see why everyone here is so anti-corporation really. I
>> mean, they can be dicks for SURE. But does that mean we should
>> restrict their TLD Access? That certainly doesn't solve the problem...
>> then again, for a .nice TLD, would a corporation even want that? ;)
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Hospedaje Web y Servidores
>> Dedicados wrote:
>>
>> Is not obligatory, but would be nice to be promoted by them.
>>>
>>> The link is not obligatory.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Ing. Alejandro M.
>>> -----------------------
>>> Hospedaje Web y Servidores Dedicados
>>> http://www.dedicados.com.mx [1]
>>> -----------------------
>>> ventas AT dedicados.com.mx [2]
>>>
>>> -----------------------
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Travis McCrea
>>> Sender:
>>> discuss-bounces@lists.**opennicproject.org<discuss-bounces AT lists.opennicproject.org>[4]
>>> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:17:57
>>> To:
>>> Reply-To:
>>> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.**org<discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>[6]
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: PROPOSAL .nice TLD
>>>
>>> you need to change .nide to .nice and I don't get your fascination
>>> with
>>> making things difficult for corporations. Now they have to
>>> advertise for
>>> OpenNIC to have a domain on your TLD?
>>>
>>> I am seriously not trying to be a dick, but I also don't get your
>>> desire
>>> to have this little grasp of power over the TLD. It's almost as if
>>> you
>>> don't really care about it, you just want the ability to have that
>>> power
>>> if you need it.
>>>
>>> Also just to be clear: While my corporation is just me and a
>>> coworker, I
>>> am fine... but after I hire more than 50 people, I have to add the
>>> link?
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 22:02 -0500, ventas AT dedicados.com.mx [7]
>>> wrote:
>>> > proposaldotNiceTLD
>>>
>>>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page