Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: PROPOSAL .nice TLD

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: PROPOSAL .nice TLD


Chronological Thread 
  • From: ventas AT dedicados.com.mx
  • To: "Hanselka, Alex" <alex AT hanselka.name>
  • Cc: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: PROPOSAL .nice TLD
  • Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:49:30 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=dedicados.com.mx; h=Received:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:X-Sender:User-Agent:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir; b=V+Ov/h2VVeCUMTcFQ5s9ZTOb2R/Rp/eHYLHEs54aLGsP1/h98Fj/0mzykSKqN/I+3wZTtCBouewogzzF8pdFpgEmaeVypfwKfOjXqEynkl0S2CAZInOeiXokDDewQwuT;
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

Ok here is again, anyone can use this tld for anything, nobody cares.

you are responsible of the domain content, not TLD, not opennic, not tier1-2, even if we offer free hosting.

if you want put a link if not dont do it.

what i want? i want to make opennic more available to users, offering other kind of TLD, with fresh ideas and many options. Other alternative tld, have more than 30-50 tld, that can make users get interested on it, because they can pick custom or funny or alternative tlds. i have some ideas about many .tld that can work, of course all free to use for anything, to anybody, no limit, just accepting donations to mantain the servers.

here is my list:
.nice
.box
.irc
.blog
.music
.video
.win
.unix
.mac
.xbox
.games
.torrent
.life
.beer
.psp
.open
.chat
.fun
.old
.dot
.fail
.euro
.dot
.sex

wich one do you like it?

thanks Maximi for ideas on the .tld`s


now, what do you think about my charter?


alex




On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:33:00 -0500, Hanselka, Alex wrote:
I just don't see why everyone here is so anti-corporation really. I
mean, they can be dicks for SURE.  But does that mean we should
restrict their TLD Access? That certainly doesn't solve the problem...
then again, for a .nice TLD, would a corporation even want that? ;)

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Hospedaje Web y Servidores
Dedicados wrote:

Is not obligatory, but would be nice to be promoted by them.

The link is not obligatory.

--

Ing. Alejandro M.
-----------------------
Hospedaje Web y Servidores Dedicados
http://www.dedicados.com.mx [1]
-----------------------
ventas AT dedicados.com.mx [2]
-----------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Travis McCrea
Sender: discuss-bounces AT lists.opennicproject.org [4]
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:17:57
To:
Reply-To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org [6]
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Fwd: PROPOSAL .nice TLD

you need to change .nide to .nice and I don't get your fascination
with
making things difficult for corporations. Now they have to
advertise for
OpenNIC to have a domain on your TLD?

I am seriously not trying to be a dick, but I also don't get your
desire
to have this little grasp of power over the TLD. It's almost as if
you
don't really care about it, you just want the ability to have that
power
if you need it.

Also just to be clear: While my corporation is just me and a
coworker, I
am fine... but after I hire more than 50 people, I have to add the
link?

On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 22:02 -0500, ventas AT dedicados.com.mx [7]
wrote:
> proposaldotNiceTLD





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page