Discuss mailing list

[nanashiRei <nanashi.rei AT gmail.com>]

For the time some people spend on this. For a stable, and maybe even
guaranteed, service with a central team that's willing to spend a fix
amount of hours/week on this to keep it up-2-date and running and
interesting on the presentational side. (Like the website discussion
right now) If there is funding, then you have more possibilities in
general. Your point is still valid **right now**, because as it is there
isn't really anyone that needs funding, either they fund them selfs or
they are already funded. But who says this won't ever change? I mean if
there was some small campaign to promote this a little, it can most
certainly explode with user interest. Once the right stone has been
tossed, there is always a chance this could become globally known and
accepted. Or is that not your goal here? Am i understanding the purpose
of making OpenNIC wrong? (a little bit of sarcasm here)

Am 04.12.2012 18:27, schrieb Aaron J. Angel:
> On 12/04/2012 12:14 PM, Travis McCrea wrote:
>> Right, if we were establishing a legal entity to operate OpenNIC as -- 
>> perhaps that shouldn't be in the United States, however, what we are 
>> talking about here is a fundraising mechanism and not a legal entity to 
>> operate OpenNIC.
> 
> Fundraising for what, then?  As I understand it right now, there are a
> handful of folks whose employers or personal pockets are willing to foot
> the bill for some or all of the infrastructure.  But none of it belongs
> to OpenNIC.
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> 

-- 
David "nanashiRei" Marner
Founder of YaS-Online.net
Service from Gamers, for Gamers.

PGP public key @ http://nanashirei.me/pgp
Commercial contact: nanashi.rei AT senshi.jp

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature