Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - [opennic-discuss] TLD minimum operational requirements.

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

[opennic-discuss] TLD minimum operational requirements.


Chronological Thread 
  • From: mike <mike AT pikeaero.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: [opennic-discuss] TLD minimum operational requirements.
  • Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:29:39 -0600
  • Envelope-to: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


I don't think it would be unreasonable, for instance, to ask that a
potential TLD host operator to have demonstrated T2 uptime > %x over a
'y' month period, prior to even putting the TLD to a vote, or
something along those lines. In other words, demonstrate some
stability prior to getting everybody all stirred up over a new TLD in
the first place.

- --Mike

On 02/06/2013 07:50 PM, kennytaylor wrote:
> +1 on this..
>
> It may be helpful to set some objective guidelines, like a %
> monthly uptime requirement, 'x' days that a TLD can be unavailable
> before being delisted, etc.
>
> Kenny


- --
Regards,

Mike Sharkey

CEO, Engineering Manager
Pike Aero Corp.
420 Cross Street
Sudbury, Ontario
Canada P3E-3W1

P:1+(705)586-2255
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJREwN7AAoJEA7EcEr0emgfM1IH/RopTiuYeTb/pVRJqGes8fAz
W/iYvtWbffWxc0xzo9DPG92yrTfa4s9uX7pQ5FS6TfNnbSqE2+CD0prHSUo9aShE
2H1xUcs3bj7PLUqHFc7J28gcirCXCz1IACKXhqebdZHSdspLZRe7cDyFAt88HXyj
G6A/qbEAhDy2xcielrZ5eWHTHVB3hjRUKA4YwrJFUcNTMeErHWTNELT99uawMcST
VgBXrvjRASFwKkV8DF9/9/w7pyeupPwNRuzcgpQuwa+x8/8u85Rd+6O9e03PnEGC
WEa0EauaNiX8fnahipZnZR5lwU7N3qdMrg6gU5lTh3OIvEpYMuX3InqMdNdfKQg=
=AeXH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page