Discuss mailing list

[Simon <simon AT hacknix.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/07/13 01:29, mike wrote:
> 
> 
> I don't think it would be unreasonable, for instance, to ask that
> a potential TLD host operator to have demonstrated T2 uptime > %x
> over a 'y' month period, prior to even putting the TLD to a vote,
> or something along those lines. In other words, demonstrate some 
> stability prior to getting everybody all stirred up over a new TLD
> in the first place.

This presumes that a TLD operator must also run a T2. I didn't think
this was a requirement. Indeed, it is perfectly possible and I think
acceptable for an operator to make a decision that they can run a
stable TLD/T1 but not a T2.


Simon

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRE3BDAAoJEK//Q6jhDibr1DUH/jBrUvKS3EP/4BfeaI+6VTiv
R08/IbmeGC+mV1VgDAaFM6jDY1/PgxDch6Vd4iRGdsE+cXptRZq2voWGhj8GXtqy
wzZFd73q0P7Lz6JcoGRnxTv1ThRVzj+42nf0uIShTlMm6skGm8XYlvMofaUr3m1u
ddRTpLaBTCqGJCSXjasQzBwhkCxlt3J7zHJoOGNAW0UH1SPkIG55XTCGR51KWdo1
VhrtUpUTVZLVFc35fUCwmVk7bQ+mS/FSw9CtLadCcw/t5lGAq6Pn6hLH7ailHhwW
+VJcJ2niFM+22rsfle4dZq6KXRyrsfadZdFPKwNaP8fDqPdEpnvwxL45BaqINs4=
=zmr1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----