Discuss mailing list

[Roberto Quiñones <roberto AT acshell.net>]

2013/2/7 Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>:
> It is *not* a requirement that a TLD operator also run a T2 server, however
> I think in this case the point is that the operator can show they have some
> experience with running a DNS service, and more importantly, can show that
> they have experience with OpenNic operations and they are not completely
> lost when it comes to how to set up a simple connection to our other
> servers.
>
> Its great that people join the project with big ideas and lots of
> enthusiasm, but if you are going to commit to running a TLD, we want to know
> that you are going to be around for the long-haul.  Honestly I don't see any
> problem with asking that a person be with the group and running a basic T2
> server for at least 6 months before considering letting them run a T1
> server.
>
>
>
> On 02/07/2013 02:13 AM, Simon wrote:
>
> On 02/07/13 01:29, mike wrote:
>
>
>> I don't think it would be unreasonable, for instance, to ask that
>> a potential TLD host operator to have demonstrated T2 uptime > %x
>> over a 'y' month period, prior to even putting the TLD to a vote,
>> or something along those lines. In other words, demonstrate some
>> stability prior to getting everybody all stirred up over a new TLD
>> in the first place.
>
> This presumes that a TLD operator must also run a T2. I didn't think
> this was a requirement. Indeed, it is perfectly possible and I think
> acceptable for an operator to make a decision that they can run a
> stable TLD/T1 but not a T2.
>
>
> Simon
>
>>
>>
>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
>

+1

-- 
--------------------------------------------
Roberto Quiñones

Owner - Service Manager and System
ACShell.NET – Internet Services
roberto AT acshell.net - www.acshell.net
San Martin #311 Santiago – CL (Chile)
+560981361713
--------------------------------------------