Discuss mailing list

[<kennytaylor AT runbox.com>]

1) It may create some customer-side demand for ISPs to support OpenNIC TLD 
resolution.

2) Probably not.  It could add a lot of administrative overhead (legal 
compliance, copyright trolls, etc).  What happens when someone registers 
playboy.porn or underage.porn?  It may be worth it to leave those hassles to 
ICANN.

Kenny

----- Start Original Message -----
Sent: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:44:29 -0500
From: "Aaron J. Angel" <thatoneguy AT aaronjangel.us>
To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [TLD Suggestion] .porn

> I can think of two pertinent questions that have me feeling leery about 
> this:
> 
> 1) Will this really attract a lot of attention?  At present, W3Techs 
> report that the xxx TLD accounts for less than two-hundredths of a 
> percent of the web.
> 
> 2) Even if the idea were to take hold and attract a sizable amount of 
> attention, will it be the type of attention we want?
> 
> 
> On 02/12/2013 02:36 PM, Lenny Guy wrote:
> > Also I suggest: .bdsm and .les
> >
> >
> > 2013/2/11 Steven Coutts <stevec AT couttsnet.com 
> > <mailto:stevec AT couttsnet.com>>
> >
> >     That's a very good point actually, it would attract a lot of
> >     attention :)
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

----- End Original Message -----