Discuss mailing list

[Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>]

I'm personally for trying it out, although I can see some folks for
.bit getting upset that it's undermining the way it's supposed to
work. Again, I'd suggest setting up the T1 and running a trial with
whichever T2 admins want to include it.

On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Ben Bristow <me AT benbristow.co.uk> wrote:
> I actually didn't know that. Although it would have been a nice TLD
> if it weren't already a DNS system as you've just said.
>
> Would be nice to see .bit resolved using OpenNIC though.
>
> -Ben
>
>
> On Sat, 03 May 2014 22:26:46 +0100, Calum McAlinden <calum AT mcalinden.me.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3 May 2014 22:00, Ben Bristow <me AT benbristow.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> .bit would be great for stores that support Bitcoin and other
>>> decentralized P2P currencies. Also would be pretty good for file sharing
>>> and general tech websites.
>>
>>
>> I can't tell if you're aware or not, but .bit is an existing
>> decentralised DNS system using the same technology as Bitcoin. I am
>> suggesting resolving the TLD, not creating it.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>