discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Amunak <amunak AT amunak.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin
- Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 02:44:01 +0200
Perosnally I would be all for
resolving .bit. I don't see how it is undermining their system -
you would be only providing a bridge to access the system in a
more convenient way. Registrations and people truly interested in
its safe, distributed nature would stay on the namecoin network
anyway. I have to agree though that consensus is needed. There's
enough mess in opennic as it is now. I don't believe "half
support" is a viable option. That said I will happily add it to my
T2 if T1 is set up on opennic.
[2014-05-03 23:53+0200] ?? <??> wrote:
I'm personally for trying it out, although I can see some folks for .bit getting upset that it's undermining the way it's supposed to work. Again, I'd suggest setting up the T1 and running a trial with whichever T2 admins want to include it. On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Ben Bristow <me AT benbristow.co.uk> wrote: I actually didn't know that. Although it would have been a nice TLD if it weren't already a DNS system as you've just said. Would be nice to see .bit resolved using OpenNIC though. -Ben On Sat, 03 May 2014 22:26:46 +0100, Calum McAlinden <calum AT mcalinden.me.uk> wrote:On 3 May 2014 22:00, Ben Bristow <me AT benbristow.co.uk> wrote:.bit would be great for stores that support Bitcoin and other decentralized P2P currencies. Also would be pretty good for file sharing and general tech websites.I can't tell if you're aware or not, but .bit is an existing decentralised DNS system using the same technology as Bitcoin. I am suggesting resolving the TLD, not creating it.-- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org |
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Calum McAlinden, 05/03/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Ben Bristow, 05/03/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Calum McAlinden, 05/03/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Ben Bristow, 05/03/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Christopher, 05/03/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Quinn Wood, 05/03/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Amunak, 05/03/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Calum McAlinden, 05/05/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Brian Koontz, 05/05/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Jeff Taylor, 05/10/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Calum McAlinden, 05/11/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoiny, Brian Koontz, 05/11/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoiny, Calum McAlinden, 05/14/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Calum McAlinden, 05/05/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Christopher, 05/03/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Ben Bristow, 05/03/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Calum McAlinden, 05/03/2014
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .bit TLD / Namecoin, Ben Bristow, 05/03/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.