Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC whois service

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC whois service


Chronological Thread 
  • From: anonymiss <krosos AT autistici.org>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNIC whois service
  • Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:50:20 +0000

Jeff Taylor:
> We've had a few attempts at a whois service over the years, but with the
> recent move to storing a large number of domains in a central location,
> I thought I would try setting up a catch-all service for us. I
> temporarily set up a service on the API server to test the new code.
> Eventually I will move it to whois.opennic.glue.
>
> # whois -h ipv4.api.opennicproject.org <domain>
>
> The output is based on http://wiki.opennicproject.org/WHOIS_Policy
> however is does not match exactly. This service currently works with
> domains from dyn/free/fur/geek/indy/oss/parody/pirate. If anyone
> running one of the other TLDs has a whois service in place, I can add an
> entry to do lookups there as well. The same applies for TLDs that we
> are peering with. This will also perform lookups on ICANN domains. I
> found a source that tries to maintain a current list of whois servers
> for each TLD, however if you do happen to find a TLD that doesn't
> resolve, let me know and I'll see if I can find another source for them.
>
> We've seen one problem with this -- the whois command does not work with
> IPv6 (thus forcing the ipv4 address above). The solution is simple, the
> final whois.opennic.glue address will only have an IPv4 address.
>
> Please let me know if you run into any other issues with this service.
> Once everything appears to be working correctly, I'll move the code to
> one of the NS0 servers.
>
>
Hi,

isn't this a bit too open in details? I know private whois is in most
cases a very weird, legal thing, but this new whos... well people using
this API can see the email address directly. that's not a bad thing
since this is pretty universal, but wouldn't it be better to also offer
some kind of protection for email addresses and/or other personal
details if they should ever become necessary?

>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>

--
--anonymiss

Email is public. Talk to me in private:
http://loupsycedyglgamf.onion/anonymiss/
irc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion:67/anonymiss
https://psyced.org:34443/anonymiss/

If you want Email-like conversation, use bitmessage:
www(vcard): http://krosos.sdf.org/
bitmessage: BM-2cSj8qEigE3CMaLU3CwPZf7T3LvzvnttsC



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page