discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 20:49:30 -0600
- Authentication-results: mx2.computerrehab.us; dmarc=none header.from=sourpuss.net
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.0 mx2.computerrehab.us C42FD2D4CF
I thought I had already sent out this info, but spamhaus is providing us with information on the .bit domains they consider 'bad'. Obviously whether you choose to use that information is up to you, but at least we do have the data available now to know what they are looking at. I believe these entries are being updated at least once a day, and entries are removed after 3 days.
First off you need an opennic user account. Go to https://opennic.org/members/ and create an account or log in to your existing account. Look at the bottom of the page and there will be two example lines there. The important part you want to copy is where it reads ?user=<username>&auth=<authcode>
To view a list of all the domains in the opennic blacklist, you can use the API page:
https://api.opennicproject.org/acl/filter/?user=<username>&auth=<authcode>
If you want to generate a file compatible with BIND9, you can ask for a specific category:
https://api.opennicproject.org/acl/filter/?user=<username>&auth=<authcode>&cat=spamhaus:sbl
If you need a custom path in the output to match your configuration, you could also add that to the URL:
https://api.opennicproject.org/acl/filter/?user=<username>&auth=<authcode>&cat=spamhaus:sbl&path=/var/named
----------
Now what do you do with this information? Well if you want to blackhole the domain, you can just reply with localhost (127.0.0.1). To do this you need a generic zone file and the data returned by the API. Within the folder where you store your zone files (perhaps using the path you specified to the API), create a file named "db.opennic_filter.spamhaus:sbl" and put in the following contents:
;
; Blacklisted domains that should be blocked from resolving
;
$TTL 3600
@ IN SOA ns1.example.com. hostmaster (
2017082300 ; serial
3600 ; refresh
180 ; retry
86400 ; expire
3600 ; default TTL
)
IN NS 127.0.0.1
IN A 127.0.0.1
* IN A 127.0.0.1
IN AAAA ::1
* IN AAAA ::1
Save the data from the API page in the same location as named.conf, giving it a name such as "named.blacklisted".
And finally, you need to update your named.conf to include the API data page by adding a line such as this:
include "/etc/bind/named.blacklisted";
Now you can restart BIND9 and test that the blackholed domains return 127.0.0.1 to your queries. Note that the API was written so we can create blacklists under different names, allowing admins to choose which information they wish to use. The zone file is saved using the name of the blacklist, so you could have different lists give different responses.
Hope that helps.
On 08/23/2017 07:17 AM,
opennic AT lesspheres.fr wrote:
Hi, I just wanted to know if @Jeff Taylor had heard about SpamHaus and a way to manage the so called .bit domains problem ? After some discussion with OVH abuse service, it looks like they might keep on suspend IPs reported by SpamHaus ! In the list of .bit domains Spamhaus gave in the report (https://www.spamhaus[.]org/sbl/query/SBL366082), some resolved IP are still listed, others removed and some just never recorded... It's a real headache to do this "the right way" and have an up-to-date domains that should be blocked or removed from a blacklist. I say should, because, again, I do not see as an obligation to blacklist a domain, just because SpamHaus asked to. Thanks, Wil.
-------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Amunak, 08/05/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/06/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Amunak, 08/05/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Al Beano, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Calum McAlinden, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Verax, 08/03/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/03/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Verax, 08/03/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Calum McAlinden, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, opennic, 08/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Wil, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jonah Aragon, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Verax, 08/25/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jonah Aragon, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Wil, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/04/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.