discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Al Beano <albino AT autistici.org>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 21:16:09 +0100
Why does it matter? Spamhaus can make as many lists as they want, OpenNIC
doesn't answer to them.
If they're going to do this, I think it's best to concede that you can't run
DNS and mail on a single server — I'd rather that than be bullied by
Spamhaus.
On 2 August 2017 18:44:15 BST, Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:
>I received complaints today that outgoing emails are getting blocked by
>
>spamhaus SBL due to resolving tehnomix.bit. The block is on a single IP
>
>address with a /32 mask, so damage is limited but unfortunately still
>causing a problem. For now this domain has been blackholed into
>127.0.0.1. Anyone using ns1.co.us.dns.opennic.glue will be affected by
>
>this.
>
>Checking my logs, I've had 301,958 lookups on my servers in the past
>11.5 hours. Apparently I screwed something up with my new internet
>connection because my servers are supposed to require whitelisting but
>they are answering all queries... gonna have to fix that!
>
>Also of note... since the block is for a single IP address, I believe
>the issue is that the DNS server is on the same IP and my mail server.
>
>Unlike the others here, I did NOT receive any notice from spamhaus
>regarding being blocked.
>
>Now for anyone else in a bind that needs to blackhole a specific domain
>
>name under BIND9, the process is fairly simple, but as mentioned
>previously you want to be open about any such changes you make to
>OpenNic servers, and any such blocking is typically not allowed under
>opennic rules...
>
>-----
>
>First you want to create a zone file to handle generic entries:
>
>-- db.blacklisted --
>;
>; Blacklisted domains that should be blocked from resolving
>;
>$TTL 3600
>@ IN SOA ns1.example.com. hostmaster (
> 2017080200 ; serial
> 3600 ; refresh
> 180 ; retry
> 86400 ; expire
> 3600 ; default TTL
> )
> IN NS 127.0.0.1
> IN A 127.0.0.1
>* IN A 127.0.0.1
> IN AAAA ::1
>* IN AAAA ::1
>
>
>Next you need config file for BIND9 to handle to entries:
>
>-- /etc/bind/named.blacklisted --
>zone "letit2.bit" {type master; file "/path/to/db.blacklisted";};
>zone "tehnomix.bit" {type master; file "/path/to/db.blacklisted";};
>
>
>And finally, add an include to your named.conf:
>include "/etc/bind/named.blacklisted";
>
>
>Reload bind, and check to see the results:
># dig tehnomix.bit @localhost
>
>;; ANSWER SECTION:
>tehnomix.bit. 3600 IN A 127.0.0.1
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>--------
>You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>You may unsubscribe by emailing
>discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Calum McAlinden, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Calum McAlinden, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/03/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Amunak, 08/05/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/06/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Amunak, 08/05/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Al Beano, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Calum McAlinden, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Verax, 08/03/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/03/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Verax, 08/03/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Calum McAlinden, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/02/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, opennic, 08/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Wil, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jonah Aragon, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Jeff Taylor, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Wil, 08/24/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] letit2 [.] bit blacklist, Calum McAlinden, 08/02/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.