Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Mailing List Voting and Formatting Policies

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Mailing List Voting and Formatting Policies


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jonah Aragon <jonah AT triplebit.net>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Mailing List Voting and Formatting Policies
  • Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 20:26:35 -0500

I should probably mention the obvious, I vote (YES):

1. YES
2. YES
3. YES
4. YES
5. YES
6. YES

Jonah

On Nov 2, 2017, at 19:53, Jonah Aragon <jonah AT triplebit.net> wrote:

Hello! 

This vote is on the changes proposed at https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2017-10/msg00135.html. The vote on adding these changes to the official OpenNIC policies will end on November 14, 2017 at 6:00 PM UTC. 

IMPORTANT, READ BEFORE VOTING: This vote is split up into 6 sections, which may be passed individually (they do not depend on each other). You should vote YES or NO on every section individually in an ordered list 1 through 6. This is an effort to get the portions the community most wants passed while keeping open the possibility of dropping certain topics that may require more discussion. If your reply contains only a single YES or NO, your vote will be counted as either YES or NO for all 6 sections proposed, respectively. Each of the six sections are labeled as such in the original proposal. 

Here’s a brief summary of the proposal, for your convenience. You should read the full proposal linked above prior to voting. 

- Very clear voting outcome requirements. Certain votes may now require more than the simple majority of votes that were required for any proposals in the past. 
- Clarified TLD proposal requirements. This should ensure an operator’s setup is configured prior to a proposal, and outline what exactly is necessary for any operator. 
- Voting and formal discussion threads posted to this list now have a very clear format that MUST be followed. This will prevent confusion on what the original poster is expecting from the community. 
- Formal discussions now have a strict minimum time requirement to be active before a vote can be pushed to the list. Voting threads now have very clear deadlines. 
- DNS operators now have certain minimum requirements to meet to keep the ability to operate key infrastructure components. 
- FUTURE peered networks now have requirements to meet before we enter an agreement with them. 

Jonah



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page