Discuss mailing list

[Fusl <opennic AT lists.dedilink.eu>]

The've been sent out as separate emails replying to the initial discussion 
email.

5: https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2017-10/msg00136.html
6: https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2017-10/msg00137.html

On 2017-11-03 08:38, Al Beano wrote:
> Where are sections 5 and 6? I can't see them in the email linked.
> 
> albino
> 
> On 3 November 2017 00:53:46 GMT+00:00, Jonah Aragon <jonah AT triplebit.net> 
> wrote:
>> Hello! 
>>
>> This vote is on the changes proposed at
>> https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2017-10/msg00135.html.
>> The vote on adding these changes to the official OpenNIC policies will
>> end on November 14, 2017 at 6:00 PM UTC. 
>>
>> IMPORTANT, READ BEFORE VOTING: This vote is split up into 6 sections,
>> which may be passed individually (they do not depend on each other).
>> You should vote YES or NO on every section individually in an ordered
>> list 1 through 6. This is an effort to get the portions the community
>> most wants passed while keeping open the possibility of dropping
>> certain topics that may require more discussion. If your reply contains
>> only a single YES or NO, your vote will be counted as either YES or NO
>> for all 6 sections proposed, respectively. Each of the six sections are
>> labeled as such in the original proposal. 
>>
>> Here’s a brief summary of the proposal, for your convenience. You
>> should read the full proposal linked above prior to voting. 
>>
>> - Very clear voting outcome requirements. Certain votes may now require
>> more than the simple majority of votes that were required for any
>> proposals in the past. 
>> - Clarified TLD proposal requirements. This should ensure an operator’s
>> setup is configured prior to a proposal, and outline what exactly is
>> necessary for any operator. 
>> - Voting and formal discussion threads posted to this list now have a
>> very clear format that MUST be followed. This will prevent confusion on
>> what the original poster is expecting from the community. 
>> - Formal discussions now have a strict minimum time requirement to be
>> active before a vote can be pushed to the list. Voting threads now have
>> very clear deadlines. 
>> - DNS operators now have certain minimum requirements to meet to keep
>> the ability to operate key infrastructure components. 
>> - FUTURE peered networks now have requirements to meet before we enter
>> an agreement with them. 
>>
>> Jonah
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>