Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Mailing List Voting and Formatting Policies

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Mailing List Voting and Formatting Policies


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Al Beano <albino AT autistici.org>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [VOTE] Mailing List Voting and Formatting Policies
  • Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 07:38:34 +0000

Where are sections 5 and 6? I can't see them in the email linked.

albino

On 3 November 2017 00:53:46 GMT+00:00, Jonah Aragon <jonah AT triplebit.net>
wrote:
>Hello!
>
>This vote is on the changes proposed at
>https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2017-10/msg00135.html.
>The vote on adding these changes to the official OpenNIC policies will
>end on November 14, 2017 at 6:00 PM UTC.
>
>IMPORTANT, READ BEFORE VOTING: This vote is split up into 6 sections,
>which may be passed individually (they do not depend on each other).
>You should vote YES or NO on every section individually in an ordered
>list 1 through 6. This is an effort to get the portions the community
>most wants passed while keeping open the possibility of dropping
>certain topics that may require more discussion. If your reply contains
>only a single YES or NO, your vote will be counted as either YES or NO
>for all 6 sections proposed, respectively. Each of the six sections are
>labeled as such in the original proposal.
>
>Here’s a brief summary of the proposal, for your convenience. You
>should read the full proposal linked above prior to voting.
>
>- Very clear voting outcome requirements. Certain votes may now require
>more than the simple majority of votes that were required for any
>proposals in the past.
>- Clarified TLD proposal requirements. This should ensure an operator’s
>setup is configured prior to a proposal, and outline what exactly is
>necessary for any operator.
>- Voting and formal discussion threads posted to this list now have a
>very clear format that MUST be followed. This will prevent confusion on
>what the original poster is expecting from the community.
>- Formal discussions now have a strict minimum time requirement to be
>active before a vote can be pushed to the list. Voting threads now have
>very clear deadlines.
>- DNS operators now have certain minimum requirements to meet to keep
>the ability to operate key infrastructure components.
>- FUTURE peered networks now have requirements to meet before we enter
>an agreement with them.
>
>Jonah
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>--------
>You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>You may unsubscribe by emailing
>discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page