Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Wyndcomm Enterprises <dima22443 AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs
  • Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 20:47:22 +0000

Soorry, I’ve mixes emails

вс, 24 дек. 2017 г. в 23:20, Wyndcomm Enterprises <dima22443 AT gmail.com>:
I’ve opened [VOTE] for pTLDs 
I’ll start from three 
.moon
.mars
.pluto
That would be enough to see do people need pTLDs.

Best,
Dmitrii


сб, 23 дек. 2017 г. в 18:04, Matthias Merkel <matthias AT boltn-hosting.com>:
You can also send me a non-list email at matthias AT boltn-hosting.com. You may be elidgable to get our NICaaS service for free

On Sat, Dec 23, 2017, 1:42 PM Alex Nuta <alex.nuta AT protonmail.com> wrote:
I want to thank you for this email, Chris.
Since finding out about OpenNIC last week, I've wanted to rush in and set up a server or five in my Canadian and French locations, but your email succinctly explains that when you do that, you need to be ready to keep it up, and you need staying power and commitment more than enthusiasm.

It's fair to say I haven't considered all of these aspects, and you probably don't need a Tier 2 server popping up, only to disappear in 6 months if I change jobs...
I'll consider this more carefully before I jump in to make sure it can be a long term arrangement.

Best,

Alex Nuta

Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland. Join for free and get highly secure email.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs
Local Time: December 23, 2017 7:10 AM
UTC Time: December 23, 2017 12:10 PM

On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Jonah Aragon wrote:
 
I am definitely opposed to people just coming out of the blue
and thinking they can just get a TLD however, because it
actually requires some effort and long-term planning
 
This has been my thinking for some time: many of the TLDs that
have been proposed of late seem to me to have an air of being a
passing fancy on the part of the proposer. I call such
proposals "Rooney-Garland" ideas: raised by enthusiastic and
well-meaning people who haven't fully considered just how much
work and effort will be required to see it through.
 
 
I'd be happy to see hundreds of new TLDs but only if they can
 
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Jonah Aragon wrote:
 
TLDs are supposed to last forever

 
This is a very important point. I'd be happy to see hundreds of
new TLDs but only if they are sure to survive. Longevity and
stability is important for all TLDs, of course. Being NFP and
cooperative the OpenNIC needs to be very wary of fatigue or
failure of anyone who commits to operating a Tier 1 or 2 server.
Having to change the root zone or its data too frequently or
having reduced redundancy does not work in OpenNIC's favour.
 
For example, I own and operate public Tier 3 DNS servers on four
continents for my own non-critical ICANN domains and though I
could offer them for OpenNIC service I don't because I'm under
no illusion of being able to do so indefinitely. If my DNS
servers go offline for any reason I'm only willing for that to
affect my own domains.
 

ChrisG
 
 
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
--

Matthias Merkel
CTO
BoltN Hosting Limited
https://boltn-hosting.com
Company registration number 11081979



--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
--
Щуров Дмитрий
Гендиректор
Wyndcomm Enterprises
--
Щуров Дмитрий
Гендиректор
Wyndcomm Enterprises



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page