Discuss mailing list

[Wyndcomm Enterprises <dima22443 AT gmail.com>]

Soorry, I’ve mixes emails

вс, 24 дек. 2017 г. в 23:20, Wyndcomm Enterprises <dima22443 AT gmail.com>:

I’ve opened [VOTE] for pTLDs 

I’ll start from three 

.moon

.mars

.pluto

That would be enough to see do people need pTLDs.

Best,

Dmitrii

сб, 23 дек. 2017 г. в 18:04, Matthias Merkel <matthias AT boltn-hosting.com>:

You can also send me a non-list email at matthias AT boltn-hosting.com. You may be elidgable to get our NICaaS service for free

On Sat, Dec 23, 2017, 1:42 PM Alex Nuta <alex.nuta AT protonmail.com> wrote:

I want to thank you for this email, Chris.
Since finding out about OpenNIC last week, I've wanted to rush in and set up a server or five in my Canadian and French locations, but your email succinctly explains that when you do that, you need to be ready to keep it up, and you need staying power and commitment more than enthusiasm.

It's fair to say I haven't considered all of these aspects, and you probably don't need a Tier 2 server popping up, only to disappear in 6 months if I change jobs...

I'll consider this more carefully before I jump in to make sure it can be a long term arrangement.

Best,

Alex Nuta

alex.nuta AT protonmail.com

Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland. Join for free and get highly secure email.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs

Local Time: December 23, 2017 7:10 AM

UTC Time: December 23, 2017 12:10 PM

From: opennic AT ned-ludd.com

To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Jonah Aragon wrote:

 

I am definitely opposed to people just coming out of the blue

and thinking they can just get a TLD however, because it

actually requires some effort and long-term planning

 

This has been my thinking for some time: many of the TLDs that

have been proposed of late seem to me to have an air of being a

passing fancy on the part of the proposer. I call such

proposals "Rooney-Garland" ideas: raised by enthusiastic and

well-meaning people who haven't fully considered just how much

work and effort will be required to see it through.

 

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HeyLetsPutOnAShow

 

I'd be happy to see hundreds of new TLDs but only if they can

 

On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Jonah Aragon wrote:

 

TLDs are supposed to last forever

 

This is a very important point. I'd be happy to see hundreds of

new TLDs but only if they are sure to survive. Longevity and

stability is important for all TLDs, of course. Being NFP and

cooperative the OpenNIC needs to be very wary of fatigue or

failure of anyone who commits to operating a Tier 1 or 2 server.

Having to change the root zone or its data too frequently or

having reduced redundancy does not work in OpenNIC's favour.

 

For example, I own and operate public Tier 3 DNS servers on four

continents for my own non-critical ICANN domains and though I

could offer them for OpenNIC service I don't because I'm under

no illusion of being able to do so indefinitely. If my DNS

servers go offline for any reason I'm only willing for that to

affect my own domains.

 

ChrisG

 

 

You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.

You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

--

Matthias Merkel
CTO
BoltN Hosting Limited
https://boltn-hosting.com
Company registration number 11081979

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

--

Щуров Дмитрий
Гендиректор
Wyndcomm Enterprises

--

Щуров Дмитрий
Гендиректор
Wyndcomm Enterprises