Discuss mailing list

[<vv AT cgs.pw>]

I suspect they've figured it out by now. However,
if there's more dollars to be gained, they'll
surely continue regardless.

~ Ole


On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 21:43:12 -0500 (EST)
"Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:

> Is ICANN planning on adding more TLDs or did they realize
> the whole thing was a failure? Plenty of small businesses
> are only using social networking sites now, and the only
> "new TLD" I can think of ever using is
> "mywaifulist.moe" (an anime fan site and Discord server).
> 
> --
> 
> -Dan Q
> 
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 18:12:07 -0800, Niles Rogoff
> <nilesrogoff AT gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > The biggest reason to limit them is that ICANN might
> > create that tld and we would be in the .free situation
> > all over again.
> > 
> > 
> > On 12/22/2017 06:09 PM, Jonah Aragon wrote:  
> > > I’m in strong favor of increasing the amount of TLDs
> > > we operate, there’s no reason to limit them, it’s an
> > > arbitrary restriction some people enjoy placing on
> > > our network. I am definitely opposed to people just
> > > coming out of the blue and thinking they can just get
> > > a TLD however, because it actually requires some
> > > effort and long-term planning—TLDs are supposed to
> > > last forever, and frankly with the latest submissions
> > > I’ve seen, I don’t have strong faith in these
> > > operators to stick around if/when they get bored.
> > >
> > > That being said, I’d be happy to approve more TLDs, I
> > > just want some kind of proof that the operators doing
> > > these proposals will actually be able to deliver.
> > >
> > > Jonah
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 8:02 PM Daniel Quintiliani
> > > <danq AT runbox.com> wrote: 
> > >> Indeed, everyone and their brother wants a TLD now.
> > >> I mean it's a good thing we have increased interest
> > >> in OpenNIC, but before proposing TLDs we need the
> > >> infrastructure and commitment per our recent votes
> > >> on policy changes.
> > >>
> > >> It sounds like this person wants multiple TLDs, but
> > >> perhaps instead of voting one-by-one he should list
> > >> the remaining TLD ideas he has into a single
> > >> discussion thread, and have a single voting thread
> > >> where we vote on each TLD. Anyone agree that's a
> > >> better idea?
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> -Dan Q
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 17:54:51 -0800, <vv AT cgs.pw>
> > >> wrote: 
> > >>> To me there is no practical logic to creating any
> > >>> more TLDs. People like to create them, and the
> > >>> pleasure they get from that seems to be what it's
> > >>> about. I do support that, but we certainly don't
> > >>> need any more TLDs. There are plenty of domains
> > >>> still available on the TLDs we have and in reality
> > >>> they can be used for anything you want. To me the
> > >>> bottom line is that we have yet to get anything to
> > >>> take off and be viable as an alternative to the
> > >>> ICANN net. It is only our DNS which is a great
> > >>> success.
> > >>>
> > >>> ~ Ole
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 23:10:22 +0000
> > >>> Wyndcomm Enterprises <dima22443 AT gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>  
> > >>>> Could you tell me please if it will be logicaly to
> > >>>> create planets’ TLDs ? Kind regards,
> > >>>> Shchurov Dmitrii
> > >>>> Tel: +79533487679
> > >>>> Skype: scdimaspb  
> > >>>
> > >>> --------
> > >>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > >>> You may unsubscribe by emailing  
> > >> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --------
> > >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > >> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > >> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > >>  
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------
> > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org  
> > 
> > -- 
> > Niles Rogoff
> > https://niles.xyz
> > https://linkedin.com/in/nilesrogoff
> > Key: B78B 908F 2343 0F80  
> 
>