discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Jonah Aragon <jonah AT triplebit.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs
- Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 02:09:32 +0000
I’m in strong favor of increasing the amount of TLDs we operate, there’s no reason to limit them, it’s an arbitrary restriction some people enjoy placing on our network. I am definitely opposed to people just coming out of the blue and thinking they can just get a TLD however, because it actually requires some effort and long-term planning—TLDs are supposed to last forever, and frankly with the latest submissions I’ve seen, I don’t have strong faith in these operators to stick around if/when they get bored.
That being said, I’d be happy to approve more TLDs, I just want some kind of proof that the operators doing these proposals will actually be able to deliver.
Jonah
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 8:02 PM Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
Indeed, everyone and their brother wants a TLD now. I mean it's a good thing we have increased interest in OpenNIC, but before proposing TLDs we need the infrastructure and commitment per our recent votes on policy changes.
It sounds like this person wants multiple TLDs, but perhaps instead of voting one-by-one he should list the remaining TLD ideas he has into a single discussion thread, and have a single voting thread where we vote on each TLD. Anyone agree that's a better idea?
--
-Dan Q
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 17:54:51 -0800, <vv AT cgs.pw> wrote:
> To me there is no practical logic to creating any
> more TLDs. People like to create them, and the pleasure
> they get from that seems to be what it's about. I do
> support that, but we certainly don't need any more
> TLDs. There are plenty of domains still available
> on the TLDs we have and in reality they can be used for
> anything you want. To me the bottom line is that we have
> yet to get anything to take off and be viable as an
> alternative to the ICANN net. It is only our DNS which
> is a great success.
>
> ~ Ole
>
>
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 23:10:22 +0000
> Wyndcomm Enterprises <dima22443 AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Could you tell me please if it will be logicaly to create
> > planets’ TLDs ? Kind regards,
> > Shchurov Dmitrii
> > Tel: +79533487679
> > Skype: scdimaspb
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Wyndcomm Enterprises, 12/22/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Jonah Aragon, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Wyndcomm Enterprises, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, vv, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Daniel Quintiliani, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Jonah Aragon, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Niles Rogoff, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Daniel Quintiliani, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, vv, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Wyndcomm Enterprises, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Amunak, 12/27/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Daniel Quintiliani, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, opennic, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Hamza, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Jeff Taylor, 12/25/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Niles Rogoff, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Jonah Aragon, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Daniel Quintiliani, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, vv, 12/23/2017
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Alex Nuta, 12/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] planets TLDs, Jonah Aragon, 12/23/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.