Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

Indeed, everyone and their brother wants a TLD now. I mean it's a good thing 
we have increased interest in OpenNIC, but before proposing TLDs we need the 
infrastructure and commitment per our recent votes on policy changes.

It sounds like this person wants multiple TLDs, but perhaps instead of voting 
one-by-one he should list the remaining TLD ideas he has into a single 
discussion thread, and have a single voting thread where we vote on each TLD. 
Anyone agree that's a better idea?

--

-Dan Q


On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 17:54:51 -0800, <vv AT cgs.pw> wrote:

> To me there is no practical logic to creating any
> more TLDs. People like to create them, and the pleasure
> they get from that seems to be what it's about. I do
> support that, but we certainly don't need any more
> TLDs. There are plenty of domains still available
> on the TLDs we have and in reality they can be used for
> anything you want. To me the bottom line is that we have
> yet to get anything to take off and be viable as an
> alternative to the ICANN net. It is only our DNS which
> is a great success.
> 
> ~ Ole
> 
> 
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 23:10:22 +0000
> Wyndcomm Enterprises <dima22443 AT gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Could you tell me please if it will be logicaly to create
> > planets’ TLDs ? Kind regards,
> > Shchurov Dmitrii
> > Tel: +79533487679
> > Skype: scdimaspb
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org