Discuss mailing list

[Jonah Aragon <jonah AT triplebit.net>]

Not totally off-topic: I’m using Pi-hole for this server, with some customizations to make it more suitable for public usage. 

I’m also working with them to get OpenNIC on the built-in list of DNS forwarders 🤞 — we’ll see how that works out. It’s a great project!

Jonah 

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 11:17 AM Wil <wil AT lesspheres.fr> wrote:

Don’t want to be off topic, but you might also find Pihole interesting : https://pi-hole.net/

As said, it’s a good start (I think) to block ads for an entire private network.

Instead of forwarding requests to google or others, you can use an Opennic Tiers 2 server...

Wil.

Moment léger au hasard : 

Si vous parlez à Dieu, vous êtes croyant... S'il vous répond, vous êtes schizophrène.

Le 15 avr. 2018 à 17:36, Al Beano <albino AT autistici.org> a écrit :

Well, there is one circumstance in which I can see it coming in handy: it allows ads that are served from the same domain as the page content - the ads that I don't actually mind seeing - through the filter, something which (afaik) uBlock and similar extensions don't do by default. I usually end up manually excepting websites that serve 'good' ads.

On 15/04/18 16:26, Jonah Aragon wrote:

Just to be clear, this DNS service isn’t superior to browser extensions in any way, and I’d recommend using an extension such as uBlock Origin over this, since it’s actually probably inferior to extensions in many ways (well actually I’d recommend using both for the following reasons).

This DNS service comes in handy when...
1. You’re using non-browser apps: this can potentially block ads in software with integrated ads/tracking.
2. You want to block tracking across your entire network. Maybe you have phones that don’t support Adblock, or your buddy comes over and you don’t need their phone transmitting your network data to some odd server courtesy of their phone’s manufacturer.
3. Adding onto #2, if you have a capped network, blocking resources on all devices at once could help you squeeze every last bit out of your internet plan.

This is obviously a crude DNS-level adblocking implementation, and it really should compliment your existing anti-tracking practices as opposed to replacing them.

There’s really no reason to not just use both, it doesn’t require any extra “effort” to a computer so to speak.

Jonah

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 8:29 AM Al Beano <albino AT autistici.org <mailto:albino AT autistici.org>> wrote:

   Here's one such _javascript_ library for detecting adblock:
   https://github.com/sitexw/FuckAdBlock - afaik this one has seen some
   widespread usage

   It can get a bit complex (seeing as they're trying to beat
   ad-blockers
   at their own game really), but from what I've gathered the general
   gist
   is that it'll try to request an advert, and if it fails, break the
   page
   in some way.

   And here's a userscript that will break the library:
   https://github.com/Mechazawa/FuckFuckAdblock

   These ad-blocking DNS servers are really neat, but to anyone
   thinking of
   setting one up, PLEASE remember to set the 'blacklist' flag on your
   server like Jonah has done - this makes it clear which servers are
   operating some kind of blacklist and not resolving domains
   'transparently', and gives users the choice.

   albino

   On 15/04/18 14:05, Jonah Aragon wrote:
   > This is a good point, and I was thinking about this myself. I’m not
   > actually sure how those anti-adblocking sites detect adblocking
   in the
   > first place. I haven’t run into this issue yet, but if anybody does
   > feel free to send me an email with a link and I’ll see if there’s
   > anything I can do about it.
   >
   > Other than that I don’t think there’s any disadvantages, and it’s
   >  probably better than browser extensions from a privacy perspective
   > since nothing gets resolved or downloaded in the first place.
   >
   > This is incredibly easy to implement. I doubt we’ll block them by
   > default at the Tier 1 level because it goes against some of our
   core
   > values of anti-censorship in a way, but it’d be easy for others to
   > setup Tier 2s in a similar manner.
   >
   > Jonah
   >
   > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 7:40 AM Al Beano <albino AT autistici.org
   <mailto:albino AT autistici.org>
   > <mailto:albino AT autistici.org <mailto:albino AT autistici.org>>> wrote:
   >
   >     One potential disadvantage is that websites with 'anti-adblock'
   >     systems
   >     in place might detect that ads won't load and try to force
   you to
   >     disable your ad-blocker. Because you're blocking ads at the DNS
   >     level,
   >     you either have to change your system's default resolver
   >     temporarily, or
   >     find some way to work around the ad-blocker detection (I think
   >     there are
   >     browser plugins for this, but I haven't had that much
   success with
   >     them
   >     in the past.)
   >
   >     Of course, you could just refuse to use these sites in the first
   >     place,
   >     but I understand that's not ideal for most people.
   >
   >     I'm still using an ad-blocking hosts file (which has a
   similar end
   >     result to this) on my phone and I don't have issues with it
   often.
   >
   >     albino
   >
   >     On 15/04/18 08:52, Sebastian Makowiecki wrote:
   >     > Excellent. Can you think of any [dis]advantages blocking those
   >     cancer
   >     > domains at the dns level? Is this hard to implement?
   >     >
   >     > Ps. These probably schould be blocked by default to make the
   >     world a
   >     > better place?
   >     >
   >     > ~
   >     > Sebastian Makowiecki
   >     >
   >     > On 14 April 2018 01:10:22 GMT+01:00, Jonah Aragon
   >     > <jonaharagon AT gmail.com <mailto:jonaharagon AT gmail.com>
   <mailto:jonaharagon AT gmail.com <mailto:jonaharagon AT gmail.com>>> wrote:
   >     >
   >     >     I'm not sure if this already preexists or is of
   interest to
   >     >     anybody here, but I've created an adblocking Tier 2
   server,
   >     >     hopefully blocking tracking and other invasive
   behaviors at the
   >     >     DNS level.
   >     >
   >     >     Just decided to advertise it here, because I'm eager
   for some
   >     >     feedback. Seems to be working well for me personally :)
   >     >
   >     >     IPv4: 167.99.153.82
   >     >     IPv6: 2604:a880:400:d1::2ef:a001
   >     >
   >     >     This server is hosted in New York, NY. If this server
   is of
   >     use to
   >     >     anybody I'll probably run another in a different
   location, so if
   >     >     anyone has suggestions let me know.
   >     >
   >     >     We're using the following blocklists:
   >     >
   https://raw.githubusercontent.com/StevenBlack/hosts/master/hosts
   >     > https://mirror1.malwaredomains.com/files/justdomains
   >     > http://sysctl.org/cameleon/hosts
   >     >
   https://zeustracker.abuse.ch/blocklist.php?download=domainblocklist
   >     >
   https://s3.amazonaws.com/lists.disconnect.me/simple_tracking.txt
   >     > https://s3.amazonaws.com/lists.disconnect.me/simple_ad.txt
   >     > https://hosts-file.net/ad_servers.txt
   >     >
   >     >     That's 121,065 domains blocked from resolution.
   >     >
   >     >     If it's of use to anybody here, I'd love to hear it!
   >     >
   >     >
   https://servers.opennic.org/edit.php?srv=ns4.ny.us.dns.opennic.glue
   >     >
   >     >     Jonah
   >     >
   >     >
   >     >
   >     >
   >     > --------
   >     > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
   >     > You may unsubscribe by emailing
   > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
   <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>
   >     <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
   <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>>
   >
   >
   >
   >     --------
   >     You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
   >     You may unsubscribe by emailing
   > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
   <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>
   >     <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
   <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>>
   >
   >
   >
   >
   > --------
   > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
   > You may unsubscribe by emailing
   discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
   <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>



   --------
   You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
   You may unsubscribe by emailing
   discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
   <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>




--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org