Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>
  • To: "discuss" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server
  • Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:43:19 -0500 (EST)

Perhaps .neo sites should focus on "the new" and "the now" which would also
be good for OpenNIC in general.

--

-Dan Q

On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:45:28 -0800, <vv AT cgs.pw> wrote:

> Looking at the .neo charter, it looks to me
> like the whole thing would benefit from being
> rewritten.
>
> Which makes me think that taking over an existing
> TLD is, at least partially, similar to starting
> a new one.
>
> What about the people with .neo domains? What do
> they think? Is there any community there?
>
> In any case I would probably support @bongobow
> taking over the TLD.
>
> Regards,
> Ole
>
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:53:06 -0500 (EST)
> "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
>
> > Would require a vote to do so.
> >
> > --
> >
> > -Dan Q
> >
> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:34:02 -0500, bongobow
> > <bongobow AT email.shininet.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I think that part can safely be dropped from the
> > > charter.
> > >
> > > ~bongobow
> > >
> > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:27:08 -0500 (EST)
> > > "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does emo subculture even still exist?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > -Dan Q
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:17:21 -0500,
> > > > <bongobow AT email.shininet.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 09:41:47 -0700
> > > > > Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > The .neo TLD is controlled by NS3, which has been
> > > > > > offline since August. The user Neo has also not
> > > > > > been on IRC for a similar period of time.  I have
> > > > > > this feeling the zone has been abandoned.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So the first question is, does anyone actually
> > > > > > use .neo domains? Is there anyone interested in
> > > > > > taking over the zone?  If the answer to both of
> > > > > > those questions is no then we should hold a vote
> > > > > > to determine if the zone should be dropped from
> > > > > > OpenNic.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am willing to take over and manage the zone, and
> > > > > keep it going as a 'general purpose' tld. I've
> > > > > setup a new t1 to replace neo's.
> > > > >
> > > > > Whether we wish to keep the TLD is another matter,
> > > > > to be decided as a community. If that answer is
> > > > > yes, there is infrastructure in place to take it
> > > > > over. IMO unless there's compelling reason to
> > > > > remove it, might as well keep it, more options
> > > > > never hurts.
> > > > >
> > > > > ~bongobow
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --------
> > > > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > > > > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > > > > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------
> > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page