discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 13:07:25 -0700
- Authentication-results: mx5.sourpuss.net; dmarc=none header.from=sourpuss.net
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.0 mx5.sourpuss.net 4F85B2D4A0
The last zone file was written in November 2017... I imagine if
anyone actually had a .neo domain in use, they might have given up
on it by now for the inability to make updates. Hopefully if anyone
still has an active domain they will speak up though, because
otherwise the best practice would be to drop all existing domains
and start over. On 01/16/2019 04:45 PM, vv AT cgs.pw
wrote:
Looking at the .neo charter, it looks to me like the whole thing would benefit from being rewritten. Which makes me think that taking over an existing TLD is, at least partially, similar to starting a new one. What about the people with .neo domains? What do they think? Is there any community there? In any case I would probably support @bongobow taking over the TLD. Regards, Ole On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:53:06 -0500 (EST) "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:Would require a vote to do so. -- -Dan Q On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:34:02 -0500, bongobow <bongobow AT email.shininet.org> wrote:I think that part can safely be dropped from the charter. ~bongobow On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:27:08 -0500 (EST) "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:Does emo subculture even still exist? -- -Dan Q On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:17:21 -0500, <bongobow AT email.shininet.org> wrote:On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 09:41:47 -0700 Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:The .neo TLD is controlled by NS3, which has been offline since August. The user Neo has also not been on IRC for a similar period of time. I have this feeling the zone has been abandoned. So the first question is, does anyone actually use .neo domains? Is there anyone interested in taking over the zone? If the answer to both of those questions is no then we should hold a vote to determine if the zone should be dropped from OpenNic.I am willing to take over and manage the zone, and keep it going as a 'general purpose' tld. I've setup a new t1 to replace neo's. Whether we wish to keep the TLD is another matter, to be decided as a community. If that answer is yes, there is infrastructure in place to take it over. IMO unless there's compelling reason to remove it, might as well keep it, more options never hurts. ~bongobow -------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org-------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org |
- [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, Jeff Taylor, 01/02/2019
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, bongobow, 01/16/2019
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, Daniel Quintiliani, 01/16/2019
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, bongobow, 01/16/2019
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, Daniel Quintiliani, 01/16/2019
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, vv, 01/16/2019
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, Daniel Quintiliani, 01/17/2019
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, Jeff Taylor, 01/18/2019
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, Rouben, 01/18/2019
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, vv, 01/16/2019
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, Daniel Quintiliani, 01/16/2019
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, bongobow, 01/16/2019
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, Daniel Quintiliani, 01/16/2019
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status of .neo zone and server, bongobow, 01/16/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.