Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Tier2 naming scheme...

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Tier2 naming scheme...


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Brian Koontz <brian AT pongonova.net>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Tier2 naming scheme...
  • Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 07:21:04 -0600
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:48:26AM -0700, Bryon Eldridge wrote:
> I think the important thing to keep in mind here is that no-one except
> the monitoring team should ever use these FQDNs. Any consumers will
> use IP addresses. So, we should setup the DNS however it's easiest
> for the monitoring team to consume. At this point, it seems like
> separate names are easier.

This is exactly the reason why we went with separate names...but I'm
OK with using whatever naming scheme is most convenient for the T2
ops.

--Brian




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page