Discuss mailing list

[Zach Gibbens <infocop411 AT gmail.com>]

For paired servers (servers with both ipv4 and ipv6) I was thinking of
adding that, but if a server is only ipv4 or ipv6, leave that out.
to show that they are paired, as an example
currently:
ns1.nz.dns.opennic.glue
ns2.nz.dns.opennic.glue
ns1.uk.dns.opennic.glue

afterwords:

ns1.ipv4.nz.dns.opennic.glue
ns1.ipv6.nz.dns.opennic.glue
ns1.uk.dns.opennic.glue

or is there a downside I'm overlooking in this?

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Brian Koontz <brian AT pongonova.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:08:25PM -0500, Zach Gibbens wrote:
>> true, but not everybody is ipv6 enabled, however it's not too hard for
>> a tunnel, it'd be another layer of checks and balances
>> not to mention your reports cite the hostname, so it'd be something to
>> clean up the reports a little too,
>>
>> I've not heard anything outright against renaming the servers into the
>> new scheme, so I'll start work on changing over to
>> nsX.ipvX.[CC].dns.opennic.glue next week (give some time for further 
>> comments)
>
> How about we don't include the ipvX string for ipv4 hosts...just ipv6?
>
> And yes, I agree: If no further comments are warranted, onward through
> the fog!
>
>  --Brian
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>