Discuss mailing list

[Brian Koontz <brian AT pongonova.net>]

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:08:25PM -0500, Zach Gibbens wrote:
> true, but not everybody is ipv6 enabled, however it's not too hard for
> a tunnel, it'd be another layer of checks and balances
> not to mention your reports cite the hostname, so it'd be something to
> clean up the reports a little too,
> 
> I've not heard anything outright against renaming the servers into the
> new scheme, so I'll start work on changing over to
> nsX.ipvX.[CC].dns.opennic.glue next week (give some time for further 
> comments)

How about we don't include the ipvX string for ipv4 hosts...just ipv6?

And yes, I agree: If no further comments are warranted, onward through
the fog!

  --Brian