Discuss mailing list

[Zach Gibbens <infocop411 AT gmail.com>]

On 01/29/2011 08:21 AM, Brian Koontz wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:48:26AM -0700, Bryon Eldridge wrote:
>> I think the important thing to keep in mind here is that no-one except
>> the monitoring team should ever use these FQDNs.  Any consumers will
>> use IP addresses.  So, we should setup the DNS however it's easiest
>> for the monitoring team to consume.  At this point, it seems like
>> separate names are easier.
> 
> This is exactly the reason why we went with separate names...but I'm
> OK with using whatever naming scheme is most convenient for the T2
> ops. 
> 
>   --Brian
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss

that's in line with what I was thinking, with the exception of I thought
it was an unintended consequence, didn't know it was intentionally
planned. I do want to keep them separate, but I was thinking of
adjusting the naming scheme a little to help both the monitoring team
and the operators, just a visual aid for when an issue crops up, to
better help resolve it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature