Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNICProject.org; have the whole website as a wiki

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNICProject.org; have the whole website as a wiki


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Amrit Panesar <apanesar AT 4195tech.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] OpenNICProject.org; have the whole website as a wiki
  • Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:38:03 -0800
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2/6/2011 11:38 AM, Brian Koontz wrote:
>
> User availability != query response rate. There are those who prefer
> forums over mailing lists, and vice versa. However, I would venture
> to say that the bulk of real OpenNIC business is done via e-mail.
> This implies that support is most likely to come to those who post
> their queries via e-mail rather than by forum.
>
This is true, I will venture out and say that the ML is much more
active and therefore more practical for the use of posting queries and
getting a timely response. Where the forum is reasonably less active
than the ML (this thread in particular is a testament to that).
> I'm all for choice, convenience, etc. But I think in this case, too
> many "official" channels of communications can be detrimental to the
> organization. I can show you many examples of posts on the forums
> where posters vent their frustrations at not getting answers to their
> queries...I can think of few, if any, examples of same on the mailing
> list.
>
I agree, I believe that everything should be consolidated into one
medium, and that should be the official forum of communication for
everyone. Therefore there should be a drastically less percentage
(even though this percentage may be small) of these frustrated users,
and a larger percentage of people that are happy with whatever queries
they possibly can have, answered in a rather timely fashion.


Honestly, If we can get everything consolidated into one official
medium of conversation (even if it happens to be a telnet based BBS
install) that can be easily accessed by everyone, perhaps
collaboration could be easier for everyone, (as opposed to splitting
the query response force between the forums and the ML)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNT6FXAAoJEA/K84XwmW5ahMkIAIp8ZE4dKObA9Mi24C86frq9
QIkKjVPA83EfcGj8rEMdqx/gHVSXjcZBanvTWd5zDTs/er62i2w+KbY+5fFomzl0
lKEtQu/W954naynDidi1cv0XTqKMaMpJ5Pl1VYEUm7vy8U2C+4IK80pRae8auBoZ
ZdqnoJNaepRxz1UEdul8boZ0YwWGM2/x2ACyv47IfsKHmWIfQvW7AqLJGTQn6Yfi
W8XKjpNUCNcTgE3lUspHp1ul1jhTTSziSRpQqSr7Eg6YEBpvMurSYERNw0QyOVyw
nzHrA+j/hgjhpiCgUM7nsOy83KXPNpjEbpqKJKLogZmgRE8uf8vFud+FljXOuaI=
=MNxT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page