discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Boily Gérald <boily.gerald AT free.fr>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org, jdemarchi AT iseek.com.au
- Cc: sageserge AT gmail.com, lauren AT vortex.com
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:59:39 +0200
- List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
- List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>
Hi,
the Dot-BIT project (http://dot-bit.org) is filling the gap by providing
a p2p and signed system to manage domains. The system is currently
usable and used by a small community, even if still young. It is
somewhat a successor of the Dot-P2P project (managed by different people).
Here is the list of currently registered domains (2643) :
=> http://namecoin.bitcoin-contact.org/q/domainlist.txt
There is a lot of domain registered and not used, a lot of domain
configured to redirect to others ICANN domains and some hosted domains.
Here is a script released to convert the DB to bind zones :
=> https://github.com/khalahan/NamecoinToBind
And a small socks proxy to read data directly from DB :
=> https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin/tree/master/client
Here is my own registration website : http://register.dot-bit.org/ (You
pay for the services here).
A domain directly registered with the software will cost almost nothing
to you : http://dot-bit.org/tools/domainCost.php /
http://dot-bit.org/tools/domainCost.php?block=50000.
There is a minimal cost to avoid too much "spam" as the system is open :
this cost doesn't go to somebody, it is lost.
Feel free to help and join us :)
Le 12/10/2011 13:20, subhuman a écrit :
>> Martin,
>>
>> I just had the following e-mail exchange with one of the dot-p2p dns group.
>>
>> It appears the dot-p2p project and by association, the .p2p TLD has
>> become somewhat of an albatross around the necks of some of those involved.
>>
>> I have offered to host a tier1 in support of the .p2p TLD as it appears
>> to have died for the most part.
>>
>> - --Mike
--
Gérald
- [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, Julian De Marchi, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, subhuman, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, mike, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, subhuman, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, mike, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, Boily Gérald, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, mike, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, NovaKing, 10/12/2011
- [opennic-discuss] grep.geek & search.geek both broken?, mike, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] grep.geek & search.geek both broken?, Peter Green, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] grep.geek & search.geek both broken?, mike, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] grep.geek & search.geek both broken?, Hanselka, Alex, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] grep.geek & search.geek both broken?, Peter Green, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] grep.geek & search.geek both broken?, Zach Gibbens, 10/13/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, NovaKing, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, mike, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] grep.geek & search.geek both broken?, Jeff Taylor, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, subhuman, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, mike, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, subhuman, 10/12/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Your article on DNS, subhuman, 10/12/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.